Indonesia's Hilirisasi Boosts Exports Amidst Developed Nation Opposition

Indonesia's Hilirisasi Boosts Exports Amidst Developed Nation Opposition

dw.com

Indonesia's Hilirisasi Boosts Exports Amidst Developed Nation Opposition

Indonesia's downstream processing policy, particularly its nickel hilirisasi, has boosted export revenue to US$34-35 billion in 2023-2024 from US$3.3 billion in 2018-2019, prompting opposition from developed nations due to disrupted supply chains. President Prabowo Subianto plans to expand this to 28 commodities to enhance economic sovereignty.

Indonesian
Germany
International RelationsEconomyGlobal EconomyTradeIndonesiaNickelResource NationalismDownstreamingHilirisasi
WtoUni Eropa
Bahlil LahadaliaPrabowo Subianto
How does Indonesia's hilirisasi strategy aim to achieve economic sovereignty and create new growth areas?
Developed countries oppose Indonesia's downstream processing roadmap because it reduces their access to raw materials. Indonesia's plan to process 28 commodities aims to bolster its economic sovereignty and create new economic growth regions, as exemplified by the substantial increase in nickel export revenue.
What are the immediate economic impacts of Indonesia's hilirisasi policy on its export revenue and relations with developed nations?
Indonesia's downstream processing of raw materials, particularly nickel, has increased export revenue significantly, reaching US$34-35 billion in 2023-2024 from US$3.3 billion in 2018-2019. This policy, however, faces opposition from developed nations concerned about disruptions to their supply chains.
What are the potential long-term risks and challenges associated with Indonesia's hilirisasi policy regarding international trade and supply chain stability?
Indonesia's hilirisasi strategy, while generating significant economic benefits, risks further trade disputes with developed nations. The long-term success hinges on balancing domestic economic growth with international trade relations and mitigating potential supply chain vulnerabilities for global industries.

Cognitive Concepts

4/5

Framing Bias

The framing strongly favors the Indonesian government's position. The headline (not provided, but inferred from the text) likely emphasizes the economic success of hilirisasi. The article's structure prioritizes Bahlil Lahadalia's statements and the positive economic figures, downplaying potential criticisms or drawbacks.

2/5

Language Bias

While the article attempts to present factual information, the choice of words like "dikecam" (condemned) when referring to developed nations' reactions reveals a biased tone. Using more neutral phrasing, such as "criticized" or "expressed concerns," would improve objectivity. Similarly, describing hilirisasi as creating "new economic growth areas" is a positive framing that could be toned down.

3/5

Bias by Omission

The article focuses heavily on Bahlil Lahadalia's perspective and the Indonesian government's position. Counterarguments from developed nations or alternative viewpoints on the economic and environmental impacts of hilirisasi are largely absent. While acknowledging space constraints is important, the lack of diverse perspectives weakens the analysis.

2/5

False Dichotomy

The article presents a somewhat simplistic eitheor framing: either Indonesia pursues hilirisasi and gains economic benefits, or it doesn't and remains dependent on exporting raw materials. The complexities of balancing economic growth with global trade relations and potential negative consequences are understated.

Sustainable Development Goals

Decent Work and Economic Growth Positive
Direct Relevance

Indonesia's downstream processing ("hilirisasi") significantly boosts economic growth by increasing the value of exported goods (e.g., nickel exports increased from US\$3.3 billion to US\$34-35 billion). This policy also creates new economic zones and jobs, directly contributing to SDG 8.