themarker.com
International Bank Reports Record-High Return on Equity for 2024
International Bank reported a net profit of 2.37 billion shekels in 2024, a 9.2% year-on-year increase, with a record-high return on equity of 19%; credit to the public increased by 10%, and public deposits rose by 12.4%.
- What is the significance of International Bank's record-high return on equity for 2024 and how does it compare to other banks?
- International Bank reported the highest return on equity in the banking system for 2024, with a net profit of 2.37 billion shekels (a 9.2% increase year-on-year) and a 19% return on equity. The fourth quarter saw a net profit of 573 million shekels (a 14.8% increase year-on-year) and a 17.4% return on equity.
- What factors contributed to International Bank's strong financial performance in 2024, specifically examining the growth in credit, deposits, and customer assets?
- The bank's strong performance reflects growth across key areas: credit to the public increased by 10% in 2024 to 129.4 billion shekels, while public deposits grew by 12.4% to 214.8 billion shekels. The increase in customer assets (25% year-on-year) to approximately 839 billion shekels also contributed to the bank's profitability.
- What are the potential long-term implications of International Bank's improved NPL ratio and how might it affect the bank's future lending strategies and profitability?
- The decline in the NPL ratio to 0.53% at the end of Q4 2024 (from 0.6% at the end of 2023) indicates improved asset quality. This positive trend, combined with strong growth in credit and deposits, suggests continued financial health and potential for further growth in the coming year.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The framing of the International Bank's success is quite positive, emphasizing its high return on equity and profit growth. The headline (if there was one) likely emphasized the record-high return. Similarly, El Al's strong performance is presented favorably, highlighting employee bonuses and significant profit increases. This framing might lead readers to overlook potential risks or limitations.
Language Bias
The language used is largely factual and neutral in its description of financial data. However, the descriptions of the banks' and El Al's performance are overwhelmingly positive, employing terms like "highest return" and "significant growth." These terms could be seen as loaded, favoring a positive interpretation. More neutral alternatives could include phrasing such as "high return" and "substantial increase.
Bias by Omission
The provided text focuses heavily on financial performance of International Bank and El Al, with limited context on the broader economic climate or geopolitical factors influencing these results. No information is given on the methodology used to calculate the return on equity. The impact of the war in Gaza is mentioned in relation to El Al's profits, but lacks further analysis of its overall economic impact. The article also omits any discussion of potential negative consequences of the trade war or the effect of tariffs on various sectors.
False Dichotomy
The text presents a somewhat simplistic view of economic factors. For example, the relationship between the weakening shekel and the trade war is mentioned, but other contributing factors are not explored. The presentation of El Al's success is largely uncritical, without considering potential downsides or alternative perspectives.
Sustainable Development Goals
The International Bank reported high return on equity, profits increased by 9.2% compared to the previous year, and credit to the public grew by 10%. El Al also reported significant profits and gave employee bonuses. These demonstrate economic growth and improved employment conditions.