International Paper Closing Georgia Mills, Eliminating 1100 Jobs

International Paper Closing Georgia Mills, Eliminating 1100 Jobs

abcnews.go.com

International Paper Closing Georgia Mills, Eliminating 1100 Jobs

International Paper is closing its Savannah and Riceboro, Georgia paper mills by September, eliminating roughly 1100 jobs and impacting the timber industry, as part of a restructuring to focus on its packaging business and increase profitability; the company is also selling its pulp division for $1.5 billion.

English
United States
EconomyLabour MarketJob LossesPaper IndustryInternational PaperMill ClosuresGeorgia Economy
International Paper Co.American Industrial PartnersUnion Bag And PaperDs SmithSavannah Economic Development Authority
Tom HamicVan JohnsonTrip TollisonJon Burns
What are the immediate consequences of International Paper's decision to close its Georgia paper mills?
International Paper will close its Savannah and Riceboro, Georgia paper mills by September, resulting in approximately 1100 job losses. This decision follows the sale of its pulp division for $1.5 billion and is intended to streamline operations and improve profitability.
How does the sale of International Paper's pulp division relate to the closure of its Georgia paper mills?
The mill closures are part of International Paper's strategy to focus on its packaging business and increase profitability. The company will incur $570 million in asset write-downs and $158 million in closure costs, reflecting a shift away from cellulose fiber production and towards containerboard.
What are the potential long-term economic and social impacts of these mill closures on Savannah and surrounding communities?
The closure of these mills, coupled with previous mill closures in Louisiana and South Carolina, signals a significant restructuring within the North American paper industry. This trend highlights the challenges faced by traditional paper manufacturers in adapting to changing market demands and competition, leading to potential long-term economic impacts on the affected communities and related industries.

Cognitive Concepts

2/5

Framing Bias

The article frames the story primarily around the negative economic consequences for Savannah, Georgia, emphasizing the loss of jobs and the historical significance of the mill. While the company's justifications are included, the framing places greater weight on the community's perspective and the negative impact of the decision. The headline itself likely contributes to this framing, focusing on the mill closure rather than the broader corporate restructuring.

2/5

Language Bias

The language used is generally neutral, although words like "devastating," "terribly sad," and "blow" carry emotional weight. These terms reflect the sentiments of those quoted rather than injecting overt bias by the author. However, the repeated use of negative language related to the closure could unintentionally shape reader perception. More neutral alternatives, such as "significant", "substantial", or "impactful", could be used to report the events in a less emotionally-charged manner.

3/5

Bias by Omission

The article focuses heavily on the economic impact of the mill closures in Savannah and the surrounding areas, quoting local officials and politicians. However, it omits perspectives from International Paper employees who will be directly affected by the layoffs. While the article mentions severance payments, it doesn't detail the support offered to displaced workers or the long-term economic consequences for them. Additionally, the article doesn't explore alternative solutions International Paper considered before deciding on closure, or the potential for retraining or job placement assistance programs. The omission of these perspectives limits a comprehensive understanding of the situation's human cost.

2/5

False Dichotomy

The article presents a somewhat simplistic dichotomy between International Paper's need to "simplify operations" and increase profitability, and the devastating economic consequences for Savannah and the surrounding region. It doesn't fully explore the complexities of the paper industry, global economic pressures, or the possibility of alternative strategies that might have mitigated the impact on the community. The focus on eitheor framing may oversimplify the nuanced issues at play.

1/5

Gender Bias

The article features quotes from several male political figures (Mayor Johnson, CEO Tollison, Speaker Burns) and mentions International Paper's male Executive Vice President. There is no clear gender imbalance in this specific article, given the context. However, a deeper analysis could investigate whether similar mill closures have featured different gender distributions in quoted sources, and if not, why. Further investigation might also be required to check if reporting on the impact of closures on the employees themselves is equally balanced, given the available information.

Sustainable Development Goals

Decent Work and Economic Growth Negative
Direct Relevance

The closure of two paper mills in Georgia will result in the loss of approximately 1100 jobs, negatively impacting employment and economic growth in the region. The ripple effects will also impact related industries such as logging and timber. This directly contradicts the aim of SDG 8 to promote sustained, inclusive and sustainable economic growth, full and productive employment and decent work for all.