usa.chinadaily.com.cn
Invasive Species Cost the World Over $2.2 Trillion Since 1960
A new study reveals that invasive species have cost the world over \$2.2 trillion since 1960, far exceeding previous estimates; the annual cost averages \$35 billion, with plants and animals such as wild boars and disease-carrying mosquitoes causing the most significant damage.
- What is the total economic cost of invasive species since 1960, and how does this compare to previous estimates?
- Invasive species cost the world an average of \$35 billion annually, totaling over \$2.2 trillion since 1960, according to a new study in Nature Ecology & Evolution. This figure is seventeen times higher than previous estimates, primarily due to improved data collection methods that included modeling for previously unstudied regions.
- Which types of invasive species cause the most economic damage, and what are the primary ways they inflict harm?
- The study, led by Ismael Soto, compiled data on 162 invasive species and modeled the economic impact for 78 more countries. The high costs are driven by factors such as increased global trade and travel facilitating the spread of invasive species, impacting agriculture, human health, and biodiversity.
- What measures can be taken to mitigate the escalating economic and environmental impacts of invasive species in the future?
- The accelerating spread of invasive species, exacerbated by global warming, poses a significant and growing economic threat. Future costs are likely to escalate unless proactive measures, such as stricter biosecurity regulations, are implemented to curb their spread.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The framing emphasizes the economic costs of invasive species, which is a valid concern, but it could be balanced by including the broader ecological and societal impacts. The headline focuses on the economic cost, which might overshadow the wider implications.
Language Bias
The language used is generally neutral and objective. The use of terms such as "blights agriculture" and "devastating damage" might be considered slightly loaded, but the overall tone remains informative.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses primarily on the economic costs of invasive species, neglecting discussion of the ecological impacts, such as biodiversity loss and disruption of ecosystems. While the mention of species extinction is included, the broader ecological consequences are understated. The article also does not explore potential solutions or mitigation strategies for managing invasive species.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article highlights the significant economic damage caused by invasive species, impacting biodiversity and ecosystems. Invasive species negatively affect agriculture, spread diseases, and accelerate species extinction, all of which directly harm life on land.