kathimerini.gr
IPRA Plans 184,000 Audits in 2025 to Collect €1.7 Billion in Unpaid Taxes
The Independent Public Revenue Authority (IPRA) in Greece will conduct over 184,000 audits in 2025 to collect €1.7 billion from tax and customs violations, focusing on property sales, income declarations, and e-commerce, using predictive models and digital cross-referencing.
- What is the IPRA's primary goal for 2025, and what specific actions will be taken to achieve it?
- In 2025, the Independent Public Revenue Authority (I.P.R.A.) in Greece plans 184,000 audits to combat tax evasion and smuggling, aiming to collect €1.7 billion from violations.
- How will the IPRA utilize technological advancements and data analysis to enhance tax collection and enforcement?
- The IPRA's strategy involves 28,500 targeted audits (including 20,300 for multiple tax periods, 4,200 for VAT returns, and 2,500 for property transfers), 9,218 partial audits using POS, myDATA, and intra-community transaction data, and 500 audits on cash purchases of assets. This is coupled with an increased focus on collecting overdue debts exceeding €107 billion.
- What are the potential long-term consequences of IPRA's 2025 plan on tax compliance and Greece's overall economy?
- The IPRA's plan includes the creation of new audit centers focused on large-scale tax evasion, fraud, and money laundering, alongside predictive models, digital cross-referencing, and automated tax audits. The aim is to reduce the tax gap and revenue loss through improved debt management, aiming for at least €3 billion in collections from past debts and a 33% recovery rate for new debts.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article frames the tax authority's actions positively, emphasizing their goal of reducing tax evasion and increasing revenue. While this is understandable, the framing potentially overlooks potential criticism or challenges associated with such a large-scale auditing program. The headline (if one existed) could heavily influence the reader's perception; a more neutral headline might be preferred.
Language Bias
The language used is largely neutral and factual. There is an absence of emotionally charged words or overtly biased descriptions. The tone is informative, presenting the tax authority's plans objectively.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses primarily on the planned actions of the tax authority, providing details on the types and number of audits. However, it omits information regarding the potential impact of these actions on taxpayers, the success rate of previous similar initiatives, and the potential for unintended consequences. This omission could limit the reader's ability to form a fully informed opinion on the effectiveness and fairness of these measures.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a somewhat simplistic view of the problem, focusing solely on the tax authority's efforts to collect revenue. It doesn't explore potential complexities, such as the challenges faced by businesses in complying with regulations, the impact on different socioeconomic groups, or alternative approaches to tackling tax evasion and smuggling.
Sustainable Development Goals
By combating tax evasion and illicit trade, and improving tax collection, this initiative aims to reduce the tax gap and loss of revenue. This contributes to a fairer distribution of resources and reduces inequality by ensuring that all taxpayers contribute their fair share. The focus on large-scale tax evasion, fraud, and money laundering further targets those who disproportionately benefit from illicit activities, thus promoting a more equitable society.