it.euronews.com
Irreversible Glacier Loss Projected Even with Reduced Warming
A new study in Nature Climate Change reveals that even a temporary exceedance of the 1.5°C global warming limit will cause irreversible damage to mountain glaciers for centuries, with smaller glaciers potentially not recovering before 2500, impacting downstream water resources and sea levels.
- How will exceeding 1.5°C impact glacial melt's contribution to sea-level rise and downstream water resources?
- The research, simulating a scenario where warming reaches 3°C by 2150 before falling to 1.5°C by 2300, shows glaciers could lose 16 percent more mass by 2200 and 11 percent more by 2500 compared to a 1.5°C world. This adds to the 35 percent already projected to melt at 1.5°C. Glacial melt since 2000 has raised sea levels by nearly two centimeters.
- What are the irreversible consequences for mountain glaciers if global warming temporarily surpasses the 1.5°C limit?
- A new study reveals that mountain glaciers will not recover for centuries if global warming temporarily exceeds 1.5°C. This is the first study to simulate glacial change until 2500 in overshoot scenarios, exceeding 1.5°C to 3°C before cooling. Current climate policies predict warming near 3°C, highlighting the urgency to change course.
- What long-term societal and environmental impacts can be expected from the 'trough water' phenomenon following peak glacial melt in overshoot scenarios?
- Even with temperatures returning to safer levels, the study indicates that much of the glacial damage from exceeding 1.5°C is irreversible. Smaller glaciers in the Alps, Himalayas, and Andes may not recover before 2500. Post-peak glacial melt reduction ('trough water') in these regions will further impact downstream communities, underscoring the long-term consequences of overshooting climate targets.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The framing emphasizes the urgency and severity of exceeding the 1.5°C warming limit. The use of phrases like "urgent appeal," "disastrous consequences," and "irreversible changes" contributes to this framing. While the information presented is factually accurate, this framing may amplify the sense of alarm and potentially overshadow other important aspects of climate change mitigation.
Language Bias
The language used is generally neutral and factual, but the framing as discussed above might influence the perception of the severity of the findings. Phrases like "disastrous consequences" and "irreversible changes" carry emotional weight. More neutral alternatives could include "significant consequences" and "long-lasting changes.
Bias by Omission
The analysis focuses primarily on the impact of exceeding 1.5°C warming on glaciers, but omits discussion of other potential consequences of exceeding this threshold, such as extreme weather events or impacts on other ecosystems. While the study acknowledges limitations by excluding polar ice sheets, further discussion of omitted consequences would strengthen the analysis.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article highlights the irreversible damage to glaciers even with a temporary exceedance of the 1.5°C warming limit. The research simulates a scenario where global warming surpasses 1.5°C, leading to significant glacier mass loss that won't recover for centuries, impacting sea levels and freshwater resources. This directly relates to the Climate Action SDG, specifically target 13.1 (Strengthen resilience and adaptive capacity to climate-related hazards and natural disasters in all countries).