lexpress.fr
ISIS Resurgence: New Orleans Attack Highlights Global Threat
On January 1, 2025, an ISIS-inspired attack in New Orleans killed at least 15, revealing the group's continuing global reach and operational capabilities despite the loss of its territorial caliphate in 2019.
- What is the significance of the New Year's Day attack in New Orleans in the context of the global resurgence of ISIS?
- A New Orleans attack, claimed by ISIS, killed at least 15 and injured dozens on New Year's Day 2025. This follows other ISIS-claimed attacks in Iran, Russia, and Oman, highlighting the group's resurgence despite the 2019 territorial defeat declared by the Trump administration. The attack underscores ISIS's continued capacity for global operations.
- How are online propaganda and operational guidance enabling ISIS attacks, despite the loss of its territorial control?
- ISIS's renewed global activity, marked by attacks and foiled plots in numerous countries, demonstrates the limitations of solely focusing on territorial control in counterterrorism strategies. The group's use of online propaganda and operational guidance facilitates attacks even without established physical bases, as evidenced by recent events in the US and Europe. The rise of ISIS in Africa further complicates efforts.
- What are the potential future impacts of reduced US counterterrorism resources and a shift in global priorities on ISIS activity and the global security landscape?
- The resurgence of ISIS poses a significant challenge to national security worldwide. The shift in focus by the US towards China and Russia, coupled with reduced resources allocated to counterterrorism, creates an environment ripe for the group's expansion. Future US policy toward ISIS is uncertain, with the potential for a change in priorities depending on the scale and nature of future attacks.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article frames the resurgence of ISIS as a direct consequence of the Trump administration's decreased focus on counter-terrorism efforts and the shift in priorities towards China and Russia. While this is a valid point, the framing omits other potential contributing factors, such as the broader political instability in the regions where ISIS operates. The headline, if there were one, might emphasize this negative consequence of Trump's policies. The opening paragraph stating that the victory against ISIS is to be credited to the first Trump administration is also a framing choice that sets the tone for the rest of the article.
Language Bias
The article uses fairly neutral language, although the repeated emphasis on the "resurgence" and "reemergence" of ISIS might subtly suggest a greater threat than a more objective assessment would portray. Words like "terrorist" and "jihadist" are used, which are loaded terms. While these are common in discussions of terrorism, the article could benefit from exploring a wider range of terminology, including terms which focus on motivations.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on the resurgence of ISIS and its attacks, but omits discussion of the broader geopolitical context that may contribute to ISIS's renewed strength. For example, the article mentions the withdrawal of US troops from Afghanistan, but doesn't analyze the impact of this withdrawal on regional stability and the potential for extremist groups to flourish. It also lacks analysis of the role of other actors in the region and their influence on ISIS' activities. The article could benefit from a more in-depth exploration of these factors, which might help explain ISIS's resurgence beyond simply attributing it to a lack of focus from the US government.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a false dichotomy by suggesting that the fight against terrorism must focus either on Islamist groups or on right-wing extremism. This oversimplifies a complex issue where multiple threats exist simultaneously. The implication is that resources must be shifted from one to the other, ignoring the possibility of tackling both effectively through different strategies and resource allocation.
Sustainable Development Goals
The resurgence of ISIS and its attacks globally, including in the US, directly undermine peace and security. The article highlights multiple attacks claimed by ISIS, demonstrating a failure to effectively dismantle the terrorist organization and maintain global security. The decreased focus on counter-terrorism efforts by the US also contributes to this negative impact.