nrc.nl
Israel's West Bank Annexation Policy: A History of Consistent Expansion
Since 1967, successive Israeli governments, driven by Revisionist Zionist ideology, have pursued a policy of expanding control over the West Bank, culminating in Netanyahu's 2019 annexation announcement, despite international opposition and the pursuit of a two-state solution by other nations.
Dutch
Netherlands
Likud PartyHamas
Benjamin NetanyahuMenachem BeginYitzhak ShamirAriel SharonDonald Trump
- What is the primary driver behind Israel's long-standing policy toward the West Bank, and what are its immediate implications?
- Since 1967, Israeli governments have consistently pursued a policy of establishing sovereignty over the West Bank, culminating in Netanyahu's 2019 annexation announcement. This policy, rooted in Revisionist Zionism, prioritizes Israeli control of the territory, regardless of international law or Palestinian claims. The Trump administration's support, as mentioned in Netanyahu's memoirs, further emboldened this pursuit.
- How have previous Israeli governments contributed to the current situation, and what role has the international community played?
- The pursuit of West Bank annexation reflects a long-held ideological goal within the Likud party, dating back to its 1977 founding. Despite occasional statements suggesting a willingness to compromise, Israeli actions—such as the establishment of over 146 settlements housing nearly 470,000 settlers—demonstrate a consistent commitment to expanding Israeli control. This contrasts sharply with the international community's continued support for a two-state solution.
- What are the potential long-term consequences of Israel's pursuit of West Bank annexation, and what strategies might effectively counter this policy?
- The continued Israeli pursuit of West Bank annexation, potentially aided by the Trump administration's support, significantly undermines the prospects for a two-state solution. This action risks further escalating the conflict, potentially leading to increased violence and instability in the region. The future trajectory hinges on whether the international community can effectively counter this policy.