repubblica.it
Italian Organic Food Market Flourishes Despite Inflation
Driven by consumer demand for healthy and sustainable options, Italy's organic food market grew by 4.5% in 2024, reaching €5.7 billion, despite inflation; modern distribution and private labels are key.
- What is the impact of rising food inflation on the growth of the Italian organic food market?
- Despite a 2.2% food inflation rate in December 2024 causing decreased purchasing power for Italian families, the organic food sector in Italy achieved a 4.5% growth in 2024, reaching a market value of €5.7 billion. This is according to preliminary data released on February 13th at Biofach, the organic food fair in Nuremberg.
- How does the distribution of organic products across different retail channels contribute to the overall market growth in Italy?
- This growth is driven by modern distribution channels, with supermarkets and hypermarkets accounting for 64.7% of organic purchases. The increasing popularity of private-label organic products (31.5% market share) enhances affordability. 93% of Italians aged 18-65 include at least one organic product in their shopping cart, up from 53% in 2013.
- What are the future prospects of the Italian organic food sector, considering consumer preferences and the country's commitment to sustainable agriculture?
- Italy's commitment to organic farming is evident, with 2.46 million hectares dedicated to organic cultivation, representing a 4.6% increase from 2023. This, combined with the growing number of operators (94,500, a 1.8% increase), positions Italy as a European leader in organic farming. The rising consumption of organic products, both at home and away from home, signifies a long-term trend toward sustainable and healthy food choices.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article frames the growth of the organic sector in a very positive light, emphasizing the positive aspects such as market growth and consumer preference. The headline and introductory paragraph immediately highlight the success of the organic sector. This positive framing might lead readers to overlook potential challenges or criticisms.
Language Bias
The language used is largely neutral, although phrases like "continues to reward certified and sustainable products" and "the organic sector is booming" carry a slightly positive connotation. More neutral alternatives could be: "consumers continue to purchase certified and sustainable products" and "the organic sector is experiencing growth.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on the growth of the organic sector in Italy, but omits discussion of potential challenges or drawbacks. For example, there is no mention of the environmental impact of increased organic farming, the potential for price increases due to higher production costs, or any counterarguments against the benefits of organic products. The lack of diverse viewpoints might limit the reader's understanding of the complete picture.
False Dichotomy
The article doesn't present a false dichotomy, but it could benefit from acknowledging potential trade-offs between organic farming and other agricultural practices or economic considerations. The positive portrayal of organic products might inadvertently create a simplified view of complex issues.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article highlights a 4.5% growth in the organic food sector in Italy, reaching €5.7 billion. This indicates increased access to higher-quality food, contributing to improved nutrition and food security, thus positively impacting the goal of Zero Hunger. The growth of organic products, even with reduced purchasing power, suggests a commitment to healthier and more sustainable food choices. Increased accessibility through private labels further broadens access to better nutrition.