corriere.it
Italian Parliament Conference Highlights Global Conflicts, Technological Warfare
A conference on 'The Human Condition' will be held at the Italian Parliament on January 20th, utilizing a mixed reality format. The event will address the unprecedented number of global conflicts (59 wars, 170 armed conflicts), the dehumanization of warfare through technology, and the systematic destruction of civilian infrastructure and cultural memory.
- What are the key concerns raised regarding the increasing number of global conflicts and the use of technology in warfare?
- On January 20th, a conference on "The Human Condition" will be held at the Italian Parliament, featuring a mixed reality format allowing remote immersive participation via VR/Metaverse. This event highlights concerns over 59 ongoing wars globally, impacting human lives and potentially altering the perception of warfare itself.
- How does the concept of "domicide" described in the article relate to the ongoing conflicts in various regions around the world?
- The conference addresses the impact of modern warfare, including the systematic destruction of civilian infrastructure ("domicide") and the erasure of cultural memory ("memoricide"). These acts, exemplified in conflicts like the Gaza war, challenge traditional notions of conflict and raise ethical questions about global responsibility.
- What potential future implications and ethical considerations arise from the systematic destruction of civilian infrastructure and cultural memory in modern warfare?
- The increasing use of technology in warfare raises concerns about the dehumanization of conflict and the need for a new ethical framework. The conference aims to foster a dialogue around these challenges, seeking to define a more humane approach to technology and conflict resolution, thereby influencing future conflict mitigation strategies.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The narrative frames the current global situation through the lens of widespread violence and suffering, emphasizing the high number of ongoing wars and the devastating impact on civilian populations. The introductory paragraph sets a somber tone, focusing on the destruction caused by conflict and the loss of human life. While this approach raises awareness about the gravity of the situation, it may inadvertently overshadow other aspects of the 'human condition' theme of the conference. The text prioritizes the negative consequences of war, potentially neglecting discussions about technological advancements or positive developments in the context of the digital age.
Language Bias
The language used is largely strong and evocative, aiming to convey the gravity of the situation. Words and phrases such as 'macabre concreteness,' 'tragica contabilità,' 'suicidio di Israele,' and 'mandria' are used to create a powerful emotional impact. While effective in expressing the author's concern, this emotional language might compromise objectivity. For example, 'suicidio di Israele' presents a strong opinion rather than a neutral observation. More neutral alternatives could include 'self-destructive path' or 'actions undermining its own interests'. Similarly, describing people as a 'mandria' (herd) is dehumanizing. A more neutral option would be to avoid such a comparison. The term 'domicidio' while informative, is a relatively new term, its usage reflecting a specific viewpoint.
Bias by Omission
The text focuses heavily on the suffering in various conflicts, particularly highlighting the plight of Ukrainians and the impact of the Israeli military actions in Gaza. However, it omits detailed discussion of the perspectives and justifications of other parties involved in these conflicts, such as Russia, Hamas, or other involved groups. While acknowledging the deaths of Russian and North Korean soldiers, it doesn't delve into the complex political and military contexts that led to their involvement. This omission might lead to an incomplete understanding of the multifaceted nature of these conflicts. The article also does not explore potential long-term consequences of the described actions.
False Dichotomy
The text presents a stark dichotomy between supporting Ukrainians and potentially overlooking the suffering of soldiers from other nations involved in conflicts. It implies a false choice between empathy for one side and indifference to others. This simplistic framing ignores the complex moral and political dimensions of these conflicts, where multiple actors bear responsibility. Additionally, the piece frames the situation in Gaza as a choice between accepting Israeli actions as illegitimate or engaging in a 'justificatory chronicle'. This ignores the nuances of the conflict and alternative interpretations of events.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article highlights numerous ongoing conflicts and wars, the highest number since World War II, causing immense suffering and loss of life. This directly contradicts the SDG target of promoting peaceful and inclusive societies for sustainable development, providing access to justice for all and building effective, accountable and inclusive institutions at all levels. The mention of "domicide," the systematic destruction of civilian infrastructure, further underscores the violation of peace and justice. The article also criticizes the lack of global response and the dehumanization of war through media coverage, hindering efforts towards peacebuilding and justice.