repubblica.it
Italian Ski Resorts Face Closure Amidst Climate Change
Due to climate change, 265 Italian ski resorts (double the number from 2020) are closed or struggling to stay open, highlighting the need for adaptation strategies in the face of reduced snowfall, increasing costs, and a potential shift in tourism.
- What is the primary cause of the significant increase in closed ski resorts in the Italian Alps and Apennines?
- The number of ski resorts in the Italian Alps and Apennines has doubled since 2020, rising from 132 to 265. This is largely due to decreased snowfall from climate change, impacting regions like Piedmont (76 closed resorts), Lombardy (33), Abruzzo (31), and Veneto (30).
- How are rising costs associated with artificial snowmaking impacting the Italian ski industry's economic viability?
- Climate change is significantly impacting Italian ski resorts. The increase in closed resorts (265 in 2024 vs 132 in 2020) is directly linked to reduced snowfall. This necessitates expensive artificial snowmaking, costing millions of euros annually in regions like Belluno, Sestriere, and Friuli Venezia Giulia.
- What are the potential long-term consequences of the current trend of decreasing snowfall and increasing reliance on artificial snowmaking for the Italian mountain regions?
- The Italian ski industry faces a critical juncture. Continued reliance on costly artificial snowmaking is unsustainable, requiring a shift towards climate adaptation strategies and alternative tourism models. The drastic reduction in natural snow, particularly in the Apennines (94% reduction at 1000-2000m), necessitates a fundamental rethink of winter tourism.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The framing consistently emphasizes the negative consequences of climate change on the ski industry and the high costs associated with artificial snowmaking. The headline and introduction set a negative tone, focusing on closures and financial losses, potentially influencing reader perception towards a pessimistic outlook on the future of mountain tourism.
Language Bias
The language used is largely neutral, although terms like "accanimento terapeutico" (desperate measures) in relation to struggling ski resorts may carry a negative connotation. The use of phrases like "grave deficit nevoso" (serious snow deficit) or "segno meno" (negative sign) clearly conveys a sense of crisis. While descriptive, these could be softened for a more balanced presentation.
Bias by Omission
The report focuses heavily on the negative impacts of climate change on the ski industry, potentially omitting positive adaptations or economic diversification efforts in mountain communities. While the financial burdens of artificial snowmaking are highlighted, alternative solutions or government support for these areas might be absent. The report also focuses primarily on Italy, neglecting a broader European or global perspective on climate change's effect on mountain tourism.
False Dichotomy
The report presents a somewhat false dichotomy by implicitly framing artificial snowmaking as the only solution to maintain the ski industry, neglecting discussion of alternative sustainable tourism models. This limits the exploration of solutions beyond technological fixes.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article highlights the negative impacts of climate change on the Italian Alps and Apennines, resulting in decreased snowfall, closure of ski resorts, and increased reliance on artificial snowmaking. This directly relates to SDG 13 (Climate Action) which aims to take urgent action to combat climate change and its impacts. The increased reliance on artificial snowmaking, while attempting to mitigate the impacts on the ski industry, further contributes to water and energy consumption, exacerbating climate change issues.