IUU Fishing: Geopolitics and Global Cooperation

IUU Fishing: Geopolitics and Global Cooperation

africa.chinadaily.com.cn

IUU Fishing: Geopolitics and Global Cooperation

The concept of illegal, unreported, and unregulated (IUU) fishing evolved from a need to regulate high-seas fishing, initially driven by the US and Western countries, but has become a geopolitical tool, with China advocating for a more cooperative approach.

English
China
International RelationsEconomyChinaGeopoliticsUnited StatesSustainable FisheriesOcean GovernanceIuu Fishing
United Nations (Un)Food And Agriculture Organization (Fao)Regional Fisheries Management Organizations (Rfmos)Chinese Distant-Water Fishing CompaniesWestern CountriesUnited States (Us)PhilippinesJapanAustraliaIndiaPacific Island Countries
Barack ObamaDonald TrumpJoe Biden
How did the definition and enforcement of IUU fishing become a tool in geopolitical strategies, specifically highlighting the actions of the US and China?
The concept of IUU fishing emerged from a need to regulate fishing in international waters, initially driven by the US and Western countries to control fishing activities of developing nations not adhering to their established frameworks. This involved creating scientific justifications and incorporating IUU fishing into international agreements like Agenda 21.
What were the key international agreements and organizations that shaped the understanding and regulation of IUU fishing, and how did their roles evolve over time?
The evolution of IUU fishing demonstrates how international environmental regulations can be influenced by geopolitical power dynamics. Developed nations used scientific evidence and international organizations to establish IUU fishing as a global concern, leveraging it to exert control over fishing practices, particularly those of developing countries. This is evident in the US's Indo-Pacific strategies.
What are the potential long-term consequences of the weaponization of IUU fishing regulations on global cooperation in marine conservation and sustainable development?
The future of IUU fishing regulation hinges on the balance between cooperation and geopolitical competition. While international agreements aim for sustainable fisheries, the weaponization of IUU fishing as a geopolitical tool by nations like the US undermines global efforts. China's approach, emphasizing a shared future and robust domestic regulations, offers a contrasting model.

Cognitive Concepts

4/5

Framing Bias

The narrative is structured to present the US and Western countries' actions regarding IUU fishing in a largely negative light, highlighting their perceived self-serving motives and strategic uses of the framework for geopolitical maneuvering. Conversely, China's efforts in combating IUU fishing are presented positively, emphasizing its responsible practices and cooperation. The headline (if present) and introduction would likely reinforce this framing.

4/5

Language Bias

The author uses strong, negative language when discussing the actions of the US and Western countries (e.g., "exploited," "politicized," "overstretched," "hegemonistic moves"). Conversely, China's actions are described using positive and neutral language (e.g., "responsible fishing country," "actively implements," "remarkable performance"). This choice of words directly influences the reader's perception of each party's intentions.

3/5

Bias by Omission

The analysis focuses heavily on the actions of the US and Western countries in developing and utilizing the IUU fishing framework, potentially omitting perspectives from developing nations directly affected by the regulations. The article also minimizes discussion of the environmental impact of IUU fishing beyond a brief mention at the end, focusing instead on geopolitical implications. While acknowledging the limitations of space, these omissions could lead to a skewed understanding of the complexities involved.

4/5

False Dichotomy

The article presents a false dichotomy by portraying the US and Western countries' actions as solely driven by a desire to regulate fishing and combat IUU fishing, while simultaneously ignoring or downplaying potential ulterior motives like geopolitical advantage. This simplification overlooks the nuanced interplay of economic, environmental, and political factors involved.

Sustainable Development Goals

Life Below Water Negative
Direct Relevance

The article details how IUU fishing severely damages marine biodiversity and ecosystems. The unsustainable practices deplete fish stocks, disrupt food webs, and harm ocean health, directly contradicting the targets of SDG 14 (Life Below Water) which aims to conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas and marine resources.