lemonde.fr
Ivory Coast Land Conflicts Fuel Protests, Threaten Elections
In Ivory Coast, land conflicts fueled by corruption within the construction ministry and conflicting land ownership systems—customary versus modern—are causing widespread protests and threaten the upcoming 2025 presidential elections.
- What are the long-term implications of the ongoing land conflicts for the economic development and social stability of Ivory Coast?
- The inadequate land administration system in Ivory Coast will likely continue to fuel social unrest and undermine the government's legitimacy, particularly as the 2025 elections approach. The slow deployment of the new attestation de droit d'usage coutumier (ADU) system and continued corruption risk exacerbating existing land disputes. The government's efforts to reform the system will need stronger enforcement and public transparency to fully address this crisis.
- What are the immediate consequences of the land ownership conflicts in Ivory Coast, and how are they impacting the political landscape?
- Land conflicts and corruption allegations against Ivory Coast's construction ministry officials have fueled protests. A woman, Dame Traoré Assatou, lost her land investment due to a flawed system where customary land rights clash with modern property laws. This issue is impacting citizens and the upcoming 2025 presidential election.
- How do the traditional land ownership systems interact with the modern legal framework in Ivory Coast, and what are the main points of friction?
- The conflict stems from a dual land ownership system: customary rights held by village chiefs and modern property laws. Discrepancies and corruption within the construction ministry's land registration process cause significant disputes, hindering development and creating public distrust. The government's recent investigation and dismissals of implicated officials signal a response to public pressure but may not solve the deep-seated systemic problems.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article frames the issue primarily through the lens of corruption and inefficiency within the government, highlighting individual cases of hardship and accusations against officials. While acknowledging the complexity of the issue, the narrative structure emphasizes the failures of the system rather than exploring the underlying systemic issues in detail or potential solutions beyond reform. The headline (if any) would further emphasize this framing.
Language Bias
The article uses relatively neutral language, but phrases like "pas très catholiques" (not very Catholic), while conveying the idea of impropriety, carries a subjective and slightly informal tone. The description of the situation as "risque d'exploser" (risk of exploding) is emotionally charged, hinting at social unrest. More neutral alternatives could include describing the situation as "highly volatile" or "potentially unstable.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on the corruption and inefficiency within the Ivorian land registry system, but it does not delve into potential solutions outside of the mentioned reform. It also omits discussion of the historical context of land ownership in Côte d'Ivoire and the impact of colonization on current land disputes. While the article mentions the involvement of foreign groups, it lacks specific details and data on their role in the problem.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a false dichotomy between customary land rights and the modern system of land ownership, implying a conflict where there might be room for reconciliation or integration of both systems. It also simplifies the political implications, portraying the opposition's criticism as solely politically motivated, without exploring the validity of their concerns.
Gender Bias
While the article uses the case of "Dame Traoré Assatou" to illustrate the problem, it doesn't explicitly focus on gendered aspects of land ownership in Côte d'Ivoire. The use of the honorific 'Dame' is slightly formal and could be omitted for neutrality. Further analysis of gendered dimensions of land access and ownership would be needed to give a complete assessment.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article highlights systemic corruption and land grabbing, disproportionately affecting vulnerable populations and exacerbating existing inequalities in access to land and resources. The complex and opaque land ownership system, with its reliance on customary law alongside a flawed modern system, creates opportunities for exploitation and abuse, particularly impacting those lacking resources to navigate the bureaucratic processes. This leads to a concentration of land ownership in the hands of the wealthy and powerful, further entrenching inequality.