jpost.com
Jabotinsky's Iron Wall: A Timeless Security Doctrine?
Analysis of Ze'ev Jabotinsky's influential "The Iron Wall" essays, exploring their historical context, core principles, and lasting relevance to Israeli security policy.
English
Israel
PoliticsMiddle EastIsraelSecurityMilitary TechnologyHistory
The New York TimesRazsvietHamasHezbollahPalestinian Authority
Ze'ev JabotinskyTom SegevAvi ShlaimYasser ArafatBill Clinton
- How relevant are Jabotinsky's ideas in the current context?
- While Jabotinsky's original language might seem outdated, the core principles of his "Iron Wall" remain relevant. His emphasis on self-reliance and a firm defense posture continues to shape Israeli security policy and debate.
- How did Jabotinsky's political views challenge common perceptions of him?
- Jabotinsky, despite his reputation as an extremist, was a liberal Zionist who accepted the possibility of peaceful Arab-Jewish coexistence. He supported equal rights for Arabs and rejected the idea of expelling them, a position contrary to widespread propaganda at the time.
- What were the main arguments in Ze'ev Jabotinsky's "The Iron Wall" essays?
- Ze'ev Jabotinsky's "The Iron Wall" essays, published in 1923, advocated for a strong, assertive Jewish state capable of defending itself against Arab hostility. His ideas emphasized self-reliance and deterrence, rejecting the notion of appeasement.
- What does Jabotinsky's "Iron Wall" concept entail in terms of Israeli policy?
- Jabotinsky's "Iron Wall" concept involves a firm political stance combined with military strength, ensuring Israel's ability to protect itself against groups like Hamas, Hezbollah, and the Palestinian Authority. This principle resonates with current Israeli policies and some statements by former US President Bill Clinton.
- What was Jabotinsky's view on achieving lasting peace between Jews and Arabs?
- Jabotinsky believed that lasting peace could only be achieved through Jewish self-defense and a demonstrably strong military stance. He rejected the idea that Arabs would willingly accept a Jewish state and emphasized that any peace agreement must be based on a realistic assessment of the situation, not wishful thinking.