dw.com
Japan Debates Married Women's Right to Keep Maiden Names
A growing movement in Japan seeks to allow married women to retain their maiden names, fueled by a UN report and political shifts, but facing opposition from conservative groups.
- What role has the UN report and recent political developments played in fueling this debate?
- This movement has gained momentum due to a UN report on gender equality and recent political shifts, but faces opposition from conservative traditionalists.
- What are the main arguments for and against allowing married women in Japan to retain their maiden names?
- The article discusses the growing movement in Japan to allow married women to retain their maiden names.
- What are the prospects for legal change in Japan regarding this issue, and what factors could influence the outcome?
- While a majority of Japanese people support a change in the law, conservative politicians and traditionalists argue that allowing married women to keep their maiden names will damage family unity.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article frames the debate as a fight for women's rights against outdated traditions, emphasizing the frustrations of women and the support from businesses and some politicians. This frames the opposition as solely conservative and traditional.
Language Bias
While the article aims for neutrality, it uses language such as "outdated traditions" and "conservative traditionalists" which may subtly portray the opposing side in a negative light.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on the arguments in favor of allowing women to keep their maiden names, while downplaying the views of those who oppose it and only presents short excerpts of the opposing arguments.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a false dichotomy between maintaining traditional family unity and allowing women to retain their maiden names, implying these two goals are mutually exclusive.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article highlights efforts to advance gender equality in Japan by challenging traditional practices that limit women's autonomy and create legal inequalities. The push to allow married women to retain their maiden names directly addresses gender inequality within the legal framework of marriage.