dw.com
Japan's Election: Tourism Boom Fuels Rise of Far-Right
Ahead of Japan's July 20th, 2025 election, rising anti-foreigner sentiment fueled by a tourism boom and reported crimes by foreign residents is boosting support for far-right parties advocating stricter immigration policies, challenging the ruling LDP.
- How is the increase in tourism impacting the upcoming Japanese election and the rise of far-right political parties?
- The surge in tourism, reaching 21.51 million arrivals in the first half of 2025, is fueling anti-foreigner sentiment in Japan, particularly due to disruptive behavior by some tourists. This, coupled with reported crimes committed by foreign residents, is boosting support for far-right parties like Sanseito, who advocate for stricter immigration policies. The ruling Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) faces a tough election on July 20th, 2025, needing at least 50 out of 124 seats to retain its majority.
- What are the specific concerns driving the anti-foreigner sentiment in Japan, and how are these concerns being exploited by political parties?
- The rising popularity of far-right parties in Japan is directly linked to increased concerns about immigration and the behavior of foreign tourists. The government's goal of 60 million annual foreign visitors by 2030, while boosting the economy, is simultaneously creating social friction. Incidents of crime and disruptive behavior by some foreigners are amplified by the media, exacerbating existing anxieties and providing ammunition for anti-immigration groups.
- What are the potential long-term consequences of the growing anti-immigrant sentiment in Japan, particularly concerning economic growth and social cohesion?
- The upcoming Japanese election reveals a critical juncture. The LDP's centrist shift has alienated its conservative base, creating an opening for far-right parties exploiting anti-immigrant sentiment. The long-term impact may involve stricter immigration policies, potentially hindering economic growth and creating further social divisions. This political shift is likely to have major implications for Japan's relationship with China, given the concerns about land purchases.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article's framing emphasizes the concerns of ultranationalist parties and the potential threat of immigration to Japanese culture and security. The headline, while not explicitly provided, would likely highlight the upcoming election and the rise of anti-immigrant sentiment. The introduction focuses on the ultranationalist parties' strategies, setting the tone for the rest of the piece. This framing prioritizes a negative perspective on immigration and potentially influences readers to view the issue through this lens.
Language Bias
The article uses loaded language such as "rebellious tourists," "chaos," and "threat to security." These terms evoke negative emotions and frame foreigners in a critical light. The use of words like "colonizing" to describe Chinese land purchases is inflammatory and lacks neutrality. More neutral alternatives could be "tourists who don't follow local customs", "concerns about increasing tourism", and "investment in Japanese real estate". The repeated focus on crimes committed by foreigners, without equal attention to crimes committed by Japanese citizens, reinforces a negative stereotype.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on the anti-immigrant sentiment and the concerns of ultranationalist parties, but gives limited space to the perspectives of immigrants themselves or proponents of immigration. While it mentions the need for foreign workers due to Japan's declining birthrate and aging population, this perspective is largely overshadowed by the negative narratives. The potential economic benefits of immigration are also not fully explored. The omission of these counterarguments creates an unbalanced portrayal of the issue.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a false dichotomy by framing the debate as solely between ultranationalist views and the perceived centrist stance of the ruling party. It overlooks the possibility of alternative approaches to immigration that balance economic needs with cultural preservation. The narrative simplifies a complex issue into an eitheor choice between complete rejection of immigration and potentially problematic levels of uncontrolled tourism.
Gender Bias
The article does not exhibit significant gender bias in its reporting. While there is mention of sexual assault, it's presented as a crime committed by foreigners, not as a reflection of gender dynamics in Japanese society. There is no evidence of unequal treatment or portrayal of men and women in the text.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article highlights a rise in anti-foreigner sentiment in Japan, fueled by concerns over tourism and immigration. This sentiment can exacerbate existing inequalities and discrimination against foreigners, hindering their social and economic integration. The focus on nationalistic policies and the rejection of foreign workers contribute to this negative impact on reducing inequalities.