nrc.nl
Jet Stream's Impact on Transatlantic Flights and Extreme Weather
The jet stream, a high-altitude wind current, significantly impacts transatlantic flight times, with westbound flights benefiting more; its formation involves warmer air expansion, pressure differences, and Earth's rotation; recent extreme weather events are more likely linked to increased evaporation and rainfall than changes in the jet stream's dynamics.
- How does the jet stream form, and what are its main components?
- The jet stream's formation is explained by three factors: warmer air expands, atmospheric pressure decreases with altitude faster for heavier air, and Buys Ballot's law describes wind deflection due to Earth's rotation. The pressure difference between denser polar air and lighter tropical air at 10 kilometers altitude creates strong winds—the jet stream—above the mid-latitudes.
- What is the impact of the jet stream on transatlantic air travel between the US and Europe?
- The increasing transatlantic flights between the US and Europe are influenced by the jet stream, a high-altitude wind current that allows for faster west-to-east travel, saving approximately one hour of flight time. European leaders traveling to the US benefit more from this than Americans traveling to Europe due to the jet stream's direction.
- What is the relationship between the jet stream and the recent increase in extreme weather events?
- Recent research suggests that while the jet stream's position has historically influenced extreme weather events like droughts and floods, its current behavior doesn't significantly deviate from past centuries. The increase in extreme weather is more likely due to enhanced evaporation and rainfall caused by global warming; however, future jet stream shifts are predicted, potentially impacting weather patterns and flight times.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article begins with an anecdote about transatlantic flights and uses this to introduce the jet stream. While this is engaging, it might unintentionally prioritize the impact on air travel over the more significant implications for weather patterns and extreme weather events. The focus on historical data regarding jet stream position and its correlation with extreme weather events strengthens the article's argument, but does not negate the potential framing bias.
Language Bias
The language used is largely neutral and objective, using precise scientific terminology. The author uses evocative language to describe the jet stream's impact ('turbo-Buys Ballot', 'grillige toevoer van regenwater') but this is generally effective and does not skew the scientific information.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses primarily on the jet stream's impact on weather and air travel, neglecting other potential contributing factors to extreme weather events beyond changes in evaporation and rainfall. While the author mentions the possibility of changes in jet stream dynamics, this aspect is not thoroughly explored.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a dichotomy between changes in jet stream dynamics and increased evaporation/rainfall as causes for extreme weather. It suggests the latter is more likely based on recent research, but other contributing factors are not considered, thus oversimplifying a complex issue.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article discusses the impact of the jet stream on weather patterns, including the increase in extreme weather events like prolonged droughts and heavy rainfall. These events are linked to climate change and the warming atmosphere, which intensifies evaporation and increases the water content of rain showers. This negatively impacts climate action efforts as it worsens the effects of climate change and undermines efforts to mitigate its impact.