nytimes.com
Journalism Wins 150th Preakness Stakes
Journalism, the Kentucky Derby runner-up, won the 150th Preakness Stakes on Saturday at Pimlico Race Course in Baltimore, overcoming a mid-race collision to defeat long-shot Gosger; the $1 exacta paid $16.90, the $1 trifecta paid $73.50, and the superfecta paid $303.40.
- How did the absence of the Kentucky Derby winner impact the Preakness Stakes field and overall race dynamics?
- Journalism's Preakness win highlights the unpredictable nature of horse racing and the importance of a horse's mental strength. The race saw a $1 exacta payout of $16.90, a $1 trifecta payout of $73.50, and a superfecta payout of $303.40, indicating the surprising outcome. Only three horses from the Kentucky Derby field competed.
- What was the outcome of the 150th Preakness Stakes, and what were the immediate financial implications for bettors?
- Journalism, the Kentucky Derby runner-up, won the 150th Preakness Stakes after overcoming a mid-race collision with Goal Oriented. Despite falling behind long-shot Gosger, jockey Umberto Rispoli guided Journalism to victory, showcasing the horse's resilience and mental fortitude.
- What does Journalism's victory signify for the horse's future prospects in the Triple Crown series, and how might this race change future racing strategies?
- This Preakness Stakes win cements Journalism's status as a top contender in horse racing, despite the mid-race incident. The absence of Kentucky Derby winner Sovereignty from the race underscores strategic planning in the Triple Crown series. Future races will reveal if Journalism can sustain this momentum.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article's framing centers heavily on Journalism's win. The headline, while factual, emphasizes the horse's victory. The introduction highlights the initial setback and subsequent triumph, reinforcing a narrative of overcoming adversity. This focus might overshadow other important elements of the race, such as the strong performance of Gosger, a long-shot horse that finished second. The selection of quotes also supports this framing, prioritizing the statements of Journalism's connections.
Language Bias
The language used is largely neutral and factual. Descriptive words like "roared down the stretch" are used to describe the horse's performance, but this is considered typical sports writing and is not considered overly loaded. The overall tone is celebratory of Journalism's win but avoids overly subjective or emotionally charged words.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on Journalism's win and the reactions of its connections. While it mentions other horses and their performances, the details provided for them are significantly less comprehensive. Information on other contenders, their strategies, and post-race comments is limited, potentially skewing the narrative towards Journalism's triumph and downplaying other significant aspects of the race. The absence of a broader analysis of the race's implications or significance beyond Journalism's victory also represents a potential bias by omission.