theglobeandmail.com
Journalist Fights for Source Protection in Contempt of Court Case
Veteran journalist Catherine Herridge fights for source protection in a high-stakes legal battle that highlights the conflict between press freedom and legal access to information.
English
Canada
Human Rights ViolationsUs PoliticsLawsuitPress FreedomFirst AmendmentLegal RightsConfidentiality
Fox NewsCbsFbiUniversity Of Management And Technology (Umt)Centre For Investigative Journalism
Catherine HerridgeYanping ChenChristopher Cooper
- Why was Catherine Herridge held in contempt of court?
- Catherine Herridge, a veteran journalist, was held in contempt of court for refusing to reveal a confidential source in a story about Yanping Chen's alleged ties to the Chinese military. This case highlights the conflict between protecting journalistic sources and the legal right to information.
- How did the judge balance press freedom and the plaintiff's rights in this case?
- The judge acknowledged the importance of a free press but balanced it against Dr. Chen's need for information. He rejected arguments that the ruling would chill investigative journalism, citing the rarity of such cases.
- What makes Herridge's case unusual compared to other legal battles involving journalists?
- Herridge's case is unique because it's not a defamation suit; she's a witness in a civil suit where the plaintiff, Dr. Chen, seeks to identify her source to vindicate her rights under the Privacy Act after the FBI leaked information.
- What is the significance of this case regarding US law and the need for source protection?
- Herridge's legal battle underscores the lack of federal-level shield laws protecting journalists' sources in the U.S. She advocates for the Press Act to provide this protection.
- What were the professional and personal repercussions for Herridge beyond the legal proceedings?
- Besides the legal ramifications, Herridge's case involves the professional toll of her actions. She was laid off from CBS amidst the legal battle, and the network initially seized her files before she retrieved them with union support.