mk.ru
Kaspersky Lab Warns of Impending Surge in Car Hacking Attacks
Kaspersky Lab warns of a surge in car hacking attacks by 2025, exploiting internet-connected multimedia systems to control vehicle functions like steering and brakes, affecting both individual drivers and transportation companies.
- How are in-car multimedia systems being exploited to gain control of vehicle functions?
- The vulnerability stems from the increasing use of over-the-air software updates and weak factory-default passwords for Wi-Fi and other communication systems in modern vehicles. This is amplified by the fact that most car components are linked via a CAN bus, accessible through the multimedia system.
- What is the primary threat posed by the predicted increase in car hacking incidents by 2025?
- Kaspersky Lab warns of a rising wave of car hacking attacks expected to peak by the end of 2025. Hackers can exploit in-car multimedia systems connected to the internet to install malware, potentially blocking vehicle access or even controlling critical functions like steering and brakes.
- What measures should be taken by both individual car owners and transportation companies to mitigate the risks of car hacking?
- The impact extends beyond individual car owners to encompass transportation companies operating fleets of vehicles. Compromised buses or trucks pose a significant risk to public safety, emphasizing the need for proactive security measures across the industry. Manufacturers should improve default password security and offer robust security upgrades.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article frames the threat of car hacking as imminent and widespread, emphasizing the potential for severe consequences like hijacking and ransom demands. This framing, while supported by expert opinions, could generate undue fear and anxiety among readers. The use of phrases like "wave of cyber attacks" and "mass penetration" contributes to this dramatic tone.
Language Bias
The article uses strong language like "wave of cyberattacks" and "mass penetration", which may heighten the sense of threat. While these terms reflect expert opinions, using more neutral phrasing, such as "increased risk of car hacking" and "growing ability to compromise systems" could reduce the alarmist tone.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses on the threat of car hacking, but omits discussion of preventative measures taken by car manufacturers beyond mentioning weak factory passwords. It also doesn't discuss governmental regulations or industry standards aimed at improving automotive cybersecurity. While acknowledging space constraints is valid, including a brief mention of these factors would have provided a more balanced perspective.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a false dichotomy by implying that only premium cars were vulnerable to hacking in the past and now mass-market cars are vulnerable. The reality is likely more nuanced, with varying levels of vulnerability across different makes and models regardless of price point.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article highlights the vulnerability of modern vehicles to cyberattacks, impacting the reliability and safety of transportation infrastructure. The increasing reliance on internet-connected systems in vehicles creates new risks, hindering the development of secure and efficient transportation systems. This negatively impacts the progress of SDG 9 (Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure), which aims to build resilient infrastructure, promote inclusive and sustainable industrialization, and foster innovation.