welt.de
Ken Follett's "Stonehenge: Circle of Days" Explores the Creation of a Neolithic Monument
Ken Follett's new historical novel, "Stonehenge: Circle of Days," details the construction of Stonehenge 4500 years ago, focusing on the challenges and human drama involved in moving massive stones and the monument's possible religious significance.
- How does Follett's meticulous research process influence the narrative and its reception?
- Follett's thorough, year-long research, vetted by historians, ensures historical accuracy, impacting the novel's credibility and appeal to readers seeking factual depth. However, this detailed approach can also result in criticism of predictable plotlines and underdeveloped characters, as some reviewers have noted.
- What are the different interpretations of Stonehenge's purpose, and how does Follett address this ambiguity in his novel?
- Stonehenge's purpose remains debated: calendar, religious site, or symbol of unity. Follett acknowledges this uncertainty, presenting his narrative as a plausible interpretation of a religious monument and pilgrimage site. This reflects the novel's fictional nature while exploring the historical possibilities.
- What is the central theme of Follett's "Stonehenge," and what are its immediate implications for understanding Neolithic society?
- The central theme is the human endeavor to build Stonehenge, showcasing the collaborative effort, resourcefulness, and resilience of Neolithic people. It implies a higher level of social organization and shared vision than previously assumed for that era. The novel explores the challenges of transporting massive stones and the impact of human drama on the project's progress.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The review presents a balanced perspective on Ken Follett's writing style and the historical accuracy of his novels. While acknowledging the positive aspects like meticulous research and easy readability, it also points out criticisms regarding predictable plots and bland characters. The review does not overtly favor either side, presenting both praise from fans and critiques from critics. The structure is neutral, presenting both positive and negative aspects without strong editorial leaning.
Language Bias
The language used is largely neutral and objective. Terms like "backsteindicken Historienromane" (brick-thick historical novels) are descriptive rather than judgmental. The use of words like "einfache Menschen" (simple people) to describe the protagonists could be considered slightly loaded, implying a lack of complexity, but it's presented in the context of the critic's opinion, not as an editorial assertion.
Bias by Omission
The review focuses primarily on Follett's narrative techniques and the reception of his work. It might benefit from including discussion of other potential biases present in the novel itself, such as gender bias in representation of characters or biases related to the portrayal of different social groups. The omission of these aspects limits a complete analysis of potential biases.
Gender Bias
The provided text doesn't offer enough detail to analyze gender bias within the novel. The review mentions the main characters, Joia and Seft, but doesn't provide enough information about their roles or portrayals to assess gender bias. Further analysis of the book's content is needed.
Sustainable Development Goals
The novel highlights the construction of Stonehenge, a massive undertaking that showcases human innovation and infrastructure development in ancient times. While not directly about modern infrastructure, it indirectly relates to the ingenuity and collaborative efforts required for large-scale projects, echoing the spirit of sustainable infrastructure development. The challenges faced in transporting and erecting massive stones without modern tools speaks to the importance of innovation in overcoming obstacles and achieving ambitious goals.