apnews.com
Kentucky School Choice Ballot Measure
Kentucky voters are deciding on a ballot measure regarding whether state tax dollars can fund private or charter schools. The highly debated issue pits supporters who argue for increased school choice against opponents who fear harm to public education.
English
United States
PoliticsUs PoliticsHealthElectionFundingEducation ReformConstitutional Law
GopKentucky Supreme Court
Rand PaulAndy BeshearJacqueline Coleman
- Who opposes the amendment and what are their concerns?
- Opponents, such as Governor Andy Beshear and Lieutenant Governor Jacqueline Coleman, argue that tax dollars should only fund public schools. They warn that public schools will suffer if funding is diverted, especially in rural areas where they are major employers. They also express concern about the affordability of private school tuition.
- What is the main issue Kentucky voters are deciding on?
- Kentucky voters are deciding on a ballot measure that would allow state lawmakers to allocate tax dollars to private or charter schools. This is the most debated issue of the fall campaign, with supporters arguing it will provide more school choices and opponents fearing it will harm public schools.
- What would the proposed constitutional amendment actually do?
- The proposed amendment would remove a constitutional barrier preventing the use of tax dollars for private school education. It would not create specific funding mechanisms, but rather allow lawmakers to develop such policies in the future.
- What is the history behind this school choice debate in Kentucky?
- This school choice debate has been ongoing for years, escalating as Republicans gained legislative power in Kentucky. Court rulings have previously blocked similar attempts to redirect public funds towards private schools, leading to this constitutional amendment.
- Who are the main supporters of the proposed amendment and what are their arguments?
- Supporters of the amendment, including Senator Rand Paul and top GOP lawmakers, believe it will help all children succeed by giving parents more options. They argue it won't harm public education and will benefit low- and middle-income families.