dw.com
Kim Jong-un attends China's WWII anniversary military parade
North Korean leader Kim Jong-un arrived in Beijing on September 2, 2025, to attend China's military parade celebrating the 80th anniversary of the end of World War II in the Pacific, with expectations of bilateral and trilateral summits.
- What broader geopolitical context explains this event?
- The parade showcases China's military might amid growing distrust of the West, particularly after Donald Trump's return to the US presidency. China aims to position itself as a reliable partner to Southeast Asian nations, its largest trading partner, contrasting with the US. The gathering of leaders from countries like Cuba, Myanmar, Iran, and Pakistan further underscores this geopolitical alignment.
- What are the potential long-term implications of this alliance?
- The strengthened alliance between North Korea and China, potentially including Russia, could lead to increased military cooperation and a more assertive stance against the West. This might affect regional stability and global power dynamics, particularly considering the ongoing tensions with the United States and its allies.
- What is the significance of Kim Jong-un's presence at the Chinese military parade?
- Kim Jong-un's attendance signifies a show of unity between North Korea and China, potentially signaling a strengthened alliance against the United States and its allies. His presence at a multilateral event marks a significant diplomatic move. This is further emphasized by the planned proximity of Kim and Putin to Xi during the parade.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article presents a balanced account of Kim Jong-un's visit to China for the military parade, mentioning both the potential for strengthening ties between China, Russia, and North Korea against the West, and the context of China's military modernization and internal issues. The description of the parade itself is factual and detailed, providing information on its scale and participants. However, the emphasis on the geopolitical implications of the parade, particularly regarding the alignment of China, Russia, and North Korea against the West, might subtly frame the event as a direct challenge to US influence.
Language Bias
The language used is largely neutral and objective, employing descriptive terms such as "high-ranking officials," "military parade," and "growing distrust." There is no overtly charged or loaded language. The use of agency reports (efe, afp, rtr) lends credibility and suggests objectivity.
Bias by Omission
While the article provides a comprehensive overview of the event, potential omissions could include alternative perspectives on the parade's significance. For instance, it might benefit from including voices from countries outside the mentioned alliances to present a more nuanced global perspective on this significant event. It also doesn't explore in depth the internal political ramifications of Kim's visit for North Korea.
False Dichotomy
The article implicitly presents a dichotomy between China, Russia, and North Korea on one side and the West (particularly the US) on the other. This simplifies a complex geopolitical landscape and omits the diverse range of opinions and interests within both 'blocs.'
Gender Bias
The article focuses primarily on political leaders, and gender is not a significant factor in the reporting. The inclusion of Choe Son-hui, the North Korean foreign minister, is noteworthy, demonstrating some level of gender inclusivity.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article discusses a military parade commemorating the end of World War II, highlighting the importance of peace and the potential for strengthened international relations through multilateral events such as this. The presence of multiple world leaders underscores efforts towards diplomacy and potentially, conflict resolution. The parade itself is a symbol of national strength, which can contribute to regional stability if used responsibly.