nrc.nl
Kissing: A Non-Universal Cultural Practice
A Sapiens magazine study reveals that kissing is not a universal human behavior, with less than half of 150 cultures studied engaging in it; prevalence correlates with social class stratification, suggesting complex evolutionary and social factors. Alternative theories propose origins in insect removal or mirroring.
- What factors contribute to the cultural variability of kissing practices, challenging the notion of it as a universal expression of romance?
- The article explores the cultural and evolutionary aspects of kissing, highlighting its non-universal nature and contrasting its prevalence in different societies. While often associated with romance, the practice of kissing is shown to be absent in numerous cultures, suggesting a complex history. The article cites a study of 150 cultures, with less than half engaging in kissing.
- How do the proposed alternative theories of kissing's origin—insect removal and mirroring—shed light on its evolutionary and social significance?
- The study in Sapiens magazine reveals a correlation between social class stratification and kissing frequency, with more hierarchical societies showing a higher prevalence. This contrasts with egalitarian hunter-gatherer societies, suggesting kissing's role might be linked to social structures and power dynamics rather than solely romance. The article also proposes alternate theories for the origins of kissing, including insect removal and mirroring.
- What future research directions could deepen our understanding of the intricate relationship between culture, biology, and the practice of kissing, particularly exploring its neurobiological basis?
- Future research could investigate the neurobiological and hormonal underpinnings of kissing's cultural variation. Further studies comparing the prevalence of kissing across diverse cultures, considering environmental and socioeconomic factors, could refine our understanding. The article's exploration of alternative theories regarding the origins of kissing calls for a broader interdisciplinary approach involving anthropology, biology, and psychology.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article frames kissing, particularly the French kiss, in a highly positive and romantic light, emphasizing the sensual and unifying aspects. The opening sentence sets this tone, and the description of the kebab-eating anecdote reinforces it. While exploring cultural variations, the overall framing leans towards celebrating the act itself.
Language Bias
The language is evocative and descriptive, occasionally using subjective terms like "hemels" (heavenly) and "versmelten" (merge). However, these are largely within the context of a personal reflection rather than objective reporting. While the language is not strictly neutral, it avoids overt bias.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on the history and cultural variations of kissing, but omits discussion of the potential negative aspects, such as the transmission of germs or the discomfort some individuals may experience. While acknowledging cultural differences is important, a balanced perspective would also consider these counterpoints.