kathimerini.gr
Kissinger's Cyprus Policy: Realpolitik and American Domestic Politics
Thomas Alan Schwartz, author of "Henry Kissinger and American Power," discusses Kissinger's foreign policy decisions during the 1970s, highlighting the Cyprus crisis, the impact of Watergate, and Kissinger's 'realpolitik' approach that prioritized stability and strategic interests over human rights and democratic principles.
- How did the Watergate scandal impact US foreign policy in the Mediterranean, and what role did Kissinger play?
- Nixon and Kissinger's approach stemmed from a desire to limit US involvement and maintain stability in the Eastern Mediterranean, fearing that conflict between Greece and Turkey could destabilize NATO's eastern flank. The Watergate scandal further concentrated power in Kissinger's hands, influencing his priorities and potentially hindering a more nuanced response to the Cyprus crisis.
- What were Washington's key foreign policy concerns in the 1970s, and how much did Greece and Cyprus factor into them?
- During the 1970s, Washington's foreign policy, under Nixon and Kissinger, prioritized withdrawal from extensive global commitments and military interventions due to strong public opposition. Their focus shifted to maintaining the status quo, particularly in Greece and Cyprus, prioritizing stability above promoting democracy or minority rights.
- Why did Kissinger refuse to meet with Constantine Karamanlis in exile, and what does this reveal about his priorities and approach to democratic transitions?
- Kissinger's 'realpolitik' approach, evident in his statement that there was 'no significant American reason' for Turkey not to control a third of Cyprus, prioritized US strategic interests over human rights and democratic principles. This narrow focus, coupled with a lack of interest in democratic transitions, led to an underestimation of the potential political fallout from his actions and a missed opportunity for meaningful diplomacy.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The framing of the interview emphasizes Kissinger's geopolitical rationale for his actions, often giving more weight to his justifications than to criticisms of his actions in Cyprus. This is evident in the extensive discussion of Kissinger's strategic thinking and comparatively less focus on the consequences of his actions for the Cypriot people.
Language Bias
While the interview maintains a mostly neutral tone, some terms carry implicit bias. For example, describing Kissinger as "distinguished" carries a positive connotation, while his actions in Cyprus were widely criticized. Phrases like "lose-lose situation" downplay the gravity of the crisis. More balanced phrasing might be preferable.
Bias by Omission
The interview focuses heavily on Kissinger's geopolitical strategies and less on the human rights implications of events in Cyprus. While the interviewer mentions human rights violations and ethnic cleansing, the analysis of Kissinger's response to these lacks depth. The omission of perspectives from Cypriot victims and their experiences could be considered a bias. The limited scope of the interview, however, might partly explain this focus.
False Dichotomy
The interview presents a somewhat simplified view of Kissinger's foreign policy decisions, focusing primarily on a 'realpolitik' lens without fully exploring alternative motivations or considerations. The portrayal of Kissinger's choices as solely driven by considerations of power dynamics and stability, without necessarily acknowledging ethical dilemmas, presents a limited perspective.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article discusses Henry Kissinger's foreign policy decisions, particularly concerning the Cyprus crisis. Kissinger's prioritization of geopolitical stability over human rights and democratic principles had a negative impact on peace and justice in Cyprus. His focus on maintaining the status quo and aligning with powerful states, even at the expense of minority rights, exemplifies a disregard for the principles of peace, justice and strong institutions. The quote, "'There is no major American reason why Turkey shouldn't hold one third of Cyprus,'" illustrates this disregard for the Cypriot people's rights and aspirations to self-determination.