npr.org
Laid" and "Going Dutch": Two New Comedies with Contrasting Premises
Peacock's "Laid" and Fox's "Going Dutch" are new comedy series; "Laid," starring Stephanie Hsu, is an American adaptation of an Australian show about a woman whose ex-boyfriends die, while "Going Dutch" stars Denis Leary and Taylor Misiak as a father and daughter navigating a military base in the Netherlands.
- How do both shows reflect current trends in television programming, specifically concerning source material and genre?
- Both shows utilize comedic setups grounded in unique scenarios: "Laid" presents a surreal mystery, while "Going Dutch" uses a fish-out-of-water narrative with family conflict. Both demonstrate a trend towards adapting international formats or exploring unique premises.
- What are the key factors determining the potential long-term success of each series, and what challenges do they face?
- The success of "Laid" hinges on Hsu's comedic performance and the show's ability to sustain its darkly comedic mystery. "Going Dutch's" success depends on the development of its father-daughter dynamic and the supporting cast, especially Catherine Tate.
- What are the central comedic premises of Peacock's "Laid" and Fox's "Going Dutch", and how do they differ in their approach to humor?
- Peacock's "Laid" stars Stephanie Hsu as a woman whose ex-boyfriends mysteriously die, prompting darkly comedic investigations. Fox's "Going Dutch" features Denis Leary and Taylor Misiak as a father-daughter military duo clashing in the Netherlands, offering a contrasting comedic premise.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The review heavily favors "Laid." The overwhelmingly positive description and detailed plot summary contrast sharply with the limited and more tentative assessment of "Going Dutch." The headline itself ('Two New Comedy Series') presents them as equals, but the narrative structure prioritizes "Laid" significantly.
Language Bias
The language used to describe "Laid" is overwhelmingly positive (e.g., "hilarious," "original," "supremely confident"), while the description of "Going Dutch" is more reserved and cautious (e.g., "I'm not sure where I stand yet"). This creates an implicit bias towards "Laid.
Bias by Omission
The review focuses heavily on "Laid" and provides limited detail on "Going Dutch." While acknowledging only seeing two episodes of the latter, more information on its plot, characters, and overall quality would provide a more balanced assessment. The omission of critical details about "Going Dutch" might lead the audience to underestimate its potential.
False Dichotomy
The review presents a false dichotomy by implicitly suggesting that only shows based on international formats or streaming services are innovative or high-quality. This ignores the potential for originality in domestically produced broadcast network shows like "Going Dutch.
Gender Bias
The review doesn't exhibit overt gender bias. Both male and female actors are mentioned, and the analysis of their performances seems neutral. However, the description of characters could benefit from avoiding gender stereotypes.
Sustainable Development Goals
The show's premise involves the death of multiple ex-boyfriends, which indirectly touches upon the issue of mortality and vulnerability affecting individuals across socioeconomic backgrounds. While not directly tackling poverty, the show's exploration of complex relationships and life circumstances can indirectly raise awareness about the diverse challenges faced by individuals in various life situations, some of whom may be experiencing poverty or economic hardship.