Lawsuit Filed Against Seven Spanish Dioceses for Promoting Conversion Therapy

Lawsuit Filed Against Seven Spanish Dioceses for Promoting Conversion Therapy

elmundo.es

Lawsuit Filed Against Seven Spanish Dioceses for Promoting Conversion Therapy

The Spanish Association Against Conversion Therapies has sued seven dioceses for hosting talks promoting conversion therapies, forbidden by the trans law, organized by Media Salud Comunicación S.L. and Marta Sanz Lovaine in 2023, presenting the "Transformados" initiative, potentially facing fines of up to €150,000.

Spanish
Spain
JusticeHuman Rights ViolationsHuman RightsSpainLawReligionLgbtq+ RightsConversion Therapy
Asociación Española Contra Las Terapias De ConversiónMedia Salud Comunicación S.l.
Marta Sanz LovaineSaúl Castro
What are the immediate consequences of the lawsuit filed against seven Spanish dioceses for hosting talks promoting conversion therapy?
The Spanish Association Against Conversion Therapies has filed a lawsuit against seven dioceses for hosting talks promoting conversion therapies for homosexuality, which are prohibited by the trans law. These talks, organized by Media Salud Comunicación S.L. and its director Marta Sanz Lovaine, were held in various parishes throughout 2023. The initiative, called "Transformados," aims to help individuals change their sexual orientation.
How does the "Transformados" initiative presented by Media Salud Comunicación S.L. promote conversion therapy, and what specific claims does it make?
The lawsuit highlights that "Transformados" presents false information and a plan for homosexual or bisexual Christians to either form a heterosexual family or live in celibacy. The talks, featuring testimonies from self-described "transformed" individuals, promote the idea that a religious path can change sexual orientation and associate homosexuality with negative consequences such as disease and violence. This is in direct violation of the trans law that prohibits the promotion of conversion therapies.
What are the potential long-term implications of this legal action regarding religious freedom, human rights, and the regulation of conversion therapy in Spain?
The long-term impact of this legal action could set a precedent for holding religious institutions accountable for promoting harmful practices. The case raises questions about the limits of religious freedom when it intersects with human rights legislation, and the success of the lawsuit could influence future attempts to promote or conduct conversion therapy within religious settings. The potential for significant fines (between €10,001 and €150,000) further underscores the seriousness of the alleged infractions.

Cognitive Concepts

4/5

Framing Bias

The headline and introduction immediately establish a negative tone by highlighting the accusations against the dioceses. The emphasis is placed on the harmful nature of conversion therapy and the legal consequences, shaping the reader's perception before presenting any other information. The structure prioritizes the negative aspects of the story.

4/5

Language Bias

The article uses loaded language such as "humiliating," "discriminatory," "stigmatizing," and "highly negative" to describe the views presented in the talks. These terms are emotionally charged and present a biased perspective. More neutral alternatives could include words like "controversial," "unconventional," or simply describing the views without judgment. The repeated use of "conversion therapy" throughout also frames the practice as inherently negative.

3/5

Bias by Omission

The article focuses heavily on the accusations and the actions of the Spanish Association against Conversion Therapies and Media Salud Comunicación S.L., but it omits perspectives from the dioceses involved. It doesn't include their statements or justifications for hosting the talks. This lack of counter-arguments might present a skewed narrative.

3/5

False Dichotomy

The article presents a false dichotomy by framing the issue as a choice between affirming homosexual orientation or undergoing conversion therapy. It ignores other potential approaches to faith and sexuality.

2/5

Gender Bias

The article focuses on the impact of conversion therapy on homosexual individuals, implicitly framing the issue primarily through a male lens. While it mentions homosexual and bisexual individuals, there is a lack of explicit mention of the impact on lesbians or other gender identities within the LGBTQ+ community. The language used doesn't explicitly suggest gender bias, but the focus might unintentionally marginalize other affected groups.

Sustainable Development Goals

Gender Equality Negative
Direct Relevance

The promotion of conversion therapies is discriminatory and harmful, violating the rights and dignity of LGBTQ+ individuals, thus negatively impacting gender equality and the full enjoyment of human rights for all. The article highlights that these therapies present a negative and monolithic view of homosexuality, associating it with various harmful issues. This perpetuates harmful stereotypes and discrimination against LGBTQ+ individuals.