kathimerini.gr
Levy Warns of Impending Iran Attack, Condemns Israeli Actions in Gaza
Gideon Levy, a former advisor to Shimon Peres, warns of an imminent attack on Iran, criticizing Israel's actions in Gaza as a war crime that violates a ceasefire agreement and lacks a clear objective, despite internal Israeli consensus on continuing the war.
- How does Gideon Levy explain the role of Donald Trump in the current escalation of violence in Gaza and its potential implications?
- Levy contends that Israel's claim of ceasefire termination due to Hamas's refusal to release hostages is unfounded; Israel should have started negotiations for a second phase a month and a half ago and withdrawn from the Philadelphia Corridor. He highlights the absence of internal Israeli opposition to the war, with dissenting voices focused solely on Netanyahu's removal, not on ending the conflict.
- What are the immediate consequences of Israel's actions in Gaza, according to Gideon Levy, and what is the global significance of the situation?
- Gideon Levy, a Haaretz columnist and former advisor to Shimon Peres, believes Israel's actions in Gaza constitute a war crime, targeting civilians and Hamas political leadership. He asserts that Israel violated the ceasefire, escalating the conflict without justification. This has led to a far more destructive second round of violence than the first.
- What are Gideon Levy's concerns about the potential future implications of the ongoing conflict in Gaza and its connection to a potential attack on Iran?
- Levy expresses serious concerns about an impending attack on Iran, citing numerous indicators pointing towards such action. He criticizes Donald Trump's inconsistent involvement, suggesting Trump's lack of commitment to international law and human rights allows Israel's aggression to continue unchecked. The potential for a large-scale conflict, with devastating consequences, is Levy's primary concern.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The framing of the article heavily favors Gideon Levy's critical stance on the Israeli government's actions. The headline and introductory paragraphs immediately position the reader to accept Levy's concerns as the primary narrative. Levy's strong opinions are presented without substantial counterpoints, reinforcing his perspective.
Language Bias
Levy uses strong and emotive language such as "maγειρεύεται" ("something is cooking"), "τρομακτικές" ("terrifying"), and "τεράστιο λάθος" ("huge mistake"), which are loaded and potentially influence the reader's perception negatively. More neutral alternatives might be, for example, "there are serious concerns," "significant," and "serious error." The repeated emphasis on the destructiveness and illegality of actions further contributes to a biased tone.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on Gideon Levy's perspective, potentially omitting other viewpoints on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and the possibility of an attack on Iran. The article doesn't present counterarguments to Levy's claims regarding the motivations of the Israeli government or the role of other international actors. The lack of alternative perspectives might limit the reader's ability to form a complete understanding of the situation.
False Dichotomy
The interview presents a false dichotomy by framing the situation as either supporting the Israeli government's actions or opposing them. Nuances and alternative approaches are not adequately explored. The option of a negotiated settlement or different strategies is barely mentioned.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article highlights the escalation of violence in Gaza, the lack of a clear end goal in the conflict, and accusations of war crimes. These actions directly undermine peace, justice, and strong institutions in the region. The breakdown of a ceasefire and the targeting of civilians further destabilize the region and hinder efforts towards lasting peace. The potential for an attack on Iran adds another layer of instability.