
elpais.com
Liga F adopts simplified VAR system for 2025-2026 season
The 16 Liga F clubs approved the implementation of the FIFA-validated "Football Video Support" (FVS) VAR system for the 2025-2026 season, allowing two review requests per team per game for goals, penalties, red cards, and identity confusion, with reviews conducted pitch-side by the main referee.
- What is the significance of Liga F adopting the FVS VAR system for the 2025-2026 season?
- The Spanish women's football league (Liga F) will implement a simplified VAR system called "Football Video Support" (FVS) starting in the 2025-2026 season. Each team will have two review requests per game, with corrected decisions restoring the used request. Reviews will be conducted by the main referee on a pitch-side monitor.
- How does the FVS system in Liga F compare to other sports leagues' use of video review technology?
- Liga F's adoption of FVS, a FIFA-validated system, follows its successful use in two international women's competitions last year and mirrors the ACB basketball league's system. This collaboration between Liga F, RFEF, and CTA aims to improve officiating fairness and efficiency in women's football.
- What potential long-term impacts could Liga F's adoption of FVS have on the professionalization and growth of women's football in Spain and internationally?
- The FVS system's cost-effectiveness and streamlined process, eliminating the need for a VOR room, positions it as a sustainable solution for women's football leagues aiming to enhance officiating accuracy without high technological investment. This decision may influence other women's leagues to consider similar VAR solutions.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The narrative frames the adoption of FVS as overwhelmingly positive, emphasizing its benefits and the collaborative efforts involved. The headline and opening paragraphs focus on the success of the approval and the positive impact on the league's professionalism. While this is factually accurate, it lacks a critical perspective that might balance the overwhelmingly positive tone.
Language Bias
The language used is largely neutral, avoiding overtly loaded terms. However, phrases like "significant advance" and "more just, transparent and professional" subtly convey a positive bias towards the FVS system. While not overtly biased, these phrases could be made more neutral (e.g., "important development", "improved fairness and transparency").
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on the implementation of FVS in Liga F, but omits discussion of potential drawbacks or challenges associated with the system. While acknowledging space constraints is valid, a brief mention of potential downsides (e.g., potential for increased delays, inconsistencies in application, cost despite being more affordable than full VAR) would have provided a more balanced perspective.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a somewhat simplistic view of the technological advancement, portraying the FVS as a clear improvement without acknowledging potential trade-offs between cost and functionality compared to full VAR systems. While it is presented as more affordable, the extent of this advantage is not fully explained, potentially creating a false dichotomy between cost and quality.
Sustainable Development Goals
The implementation of FVS in the Liga F demonstrates a commitment to fair and professional officiating in women's football. This contributes to gender equality by ensuring that women athletes compete on a level playing field with access to technology that improves the accuracy of refereeing decisions, thus reducing biases that might otherwise disadvantage women's teams. The quote "Su incorporación supone un avance significativo en la mejora del nivel técnico de las decisiones arbitrales en momentos decisivos, garantizando así una competición más justa, transparente y profesional" highlights this commitment to fairness and professionalism.