Long COVID Impacts Menstrual Cycles, Study Finds

Long COVID Impacts Menstrual Cycles, Study Finds

gr.euronews.com

Long COVID Impacts Menstrual Cycles, Study Finds

A new study of nearly 12,000 women in the UK found that women with long COVID experienced heavier, longer periods and bleeding between periods, and that menstrual cycle phases may influence long COVID symptom severity.

Greek
United States
HealthGender IssuesWomen's HealthLong CovidInflammationMenstrual CycleHormonal Changes
University Of EdinburghCentre For Reproductive Health
Jacqueline Maybin
How might the menstrual cycle itself influence the severity of long COVID symptoms?
Researchers found that long COVID symptoms fluctuated throughout the menstrual cycle, worsening before menstruation and during the proliferative phase. This suggests hormonal influence on symptom severity, potentially due to inflammation of the endometrium and androgen regulation.
What are the key findings of the study on the relationship between long COVID and menstrual cycles?
The study revealed that women with long COVID reported heavier, longer periods and intermenstrual bleeding. Conversely, women recovered from COVID-19 showed minimal menstrual disruption. These changes may contribute to iron deficiency, a common long COVID symptom.
What are the broader implications of this research for understanding and treating long COVID in women?
The findings indicate a potential interplay between hormonal fluctuations and long COVID symptoms, suggesting new avenues for treatment. The observed endometrial inflammation may contribute to abnormal bleeding and symptom exacerbation. Further research is needed to develop targeted therapies.

Cognitive Concepts

1/5

Framing Bias

The article presents a balanced view of the research findings, highlighting both the impact of long COVID on menstrual cycles and the potential influence of menstrual cycles on long COVID symptoms. The study's limitations are not explicitly stated, but the cautious and measured tone of the reporting suggests a degree of awareness of potential biases or confounding factors. The use of direct quotes from the researcher adds credibility and avoids overly interpretive framing.

1/5

Language Bias

The language used is largely neutral and objective. The article avoids sensationalism or overly emotive language. While terms like "major" and "severe" are used to describe some symptoms, these are presented within the context of the research findings and supported by evidence. There is no evidence of loaded language or charged terminology.

2/5

Bias by Omission

While the study focused on women in the UK, the article doesn't explicitly discuss whether the findings might be generalizable to other populations or if there are any limitations based on the demographics of the study participants. The omission of this information does not appear to significantly mislead the reader, but it would strengthen the piece to include a brief acknowledgement of the study's scope and limitations.

Sustainable Development Goals

Good Health and Well-being Negative
Direct Relevance

The research directly addresses the negative impact of long COVID on women's health, specifically menstrual cycle irregularities. These irregularities can lead to further health complications like iron deficiency anemia, impacting overall well-being. The study highlights the need for better understanding and treatment of these issues, which is directly relevant to SDG 3 (Good Health and Well-being).