elpais.com
Los Muértimer": A Generic Adaptation
Álvaro Fernández Armero's "Los Muértimer" adapts Léa Mazé's graphic novels, but abandons its unique visual style, resulting in a generic family film lacking originality, despite being produced by Álex de la Iglesia.
- How does the film's visual style contribute to its overall reception and market position compared to similar family films?
- Unlike Mazé's acclaimed "ligne claire" aesthetic, the film adopts a homogenized visual style common in streaming platforms' family films, lacking originality and risk.
- What are the potential long-term implications of this homogenization trend on Spanish cinema's artistic diversity and creative output?
- The film's failure to capture the essence of the graphic novels suggests a trend in Spanish cinema towards formulaic productions, prioritizing commercial appeal over artistic vision. This homogenization may stifle creativity and limit the exploration of unique narratives.
- What specific elements of Léa Mazé's graphic novels were omitted in the film adaptation, and how does this impact the overall viewing experience?
- Los Muértimer", a film adaptation of Léa Mazé's graphic novels, significantly deviates from the source material's distinctive visual style and melancholic atmosphere, resulting in a generic family film.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The headline and synopsis are presented as misleading, setting a negative expectation for the review. The repeated use of negative language ('prescinde sin disimulo alguno,' 'alarmante homogeneización visual,' 'descafeinada, domesticada') frames the film unfavorably from the outset. Comparisons to superior films (Mi chica, La familia Addams) further emphasize its perceived deficiencies.
Language Bias
The review uses strongly negative and loaded language ('alarmante,' 'indistinguible,' 'descafeinada,' 'domesticada') to describe the film. These terms express strong disapproval and shape the reader's perception negatively. Neutral alternatives would be more objective, such as 'unremarkable,' 'similar to many others,' 'toned-down,' and 'conventional.'
Bias by Omission
The review omits discussion of the film's potential positive aspects, focusing primarily on its perceived shortcomings. While it mentions the source material's visual style and melancholic atmosphere, it doesn't explore whether any elements of these were successfully translated to the film, or what aspects of the adaptation might appeal to audiences.
False Dichotomy
The review sets up a false dichotomy between 'stimulating visual and narrative universe' and a 'product indistinguishable from so many others.' This ignores the possibility of a film that might not be groundbreaking but still offer enjoyment or value.
Sustainable Development Goals
The movie's failure to capture the original graphic novel's unique visual style and melancholic atmosphere, resulting in a generic and uninspired product, indirectly impacts the quality of entertainment and potentially hinders the appreciation of artistic expression which can be a part of education. The film's reliance on clichés and lack of originality also limits its potential to stimulate critical thinking and creativity.