faz.net
Lotus Shoes: Western Interpretations and Ethical Museum Practices
The Museum am Rothenbaum's open-access publication on its collection of "lotus shoes" analyzes Western misinterpretations of Chinese foot binding, using anatomical studies and fictional representations to challenge colonial narratives and advocate for more ethical museum practices.
- How did Western anatomical studies and popular culture representations shape the understanding and interpretation of Chinese foot binding, and what biases are revealed?
- Western views of foot binding often fetishized the practice, overlooking the fact that even husbands rarely saw their wives' unbound feet. The binding process was done by women, challenging simplistic colonial narratives. The book examines anatomical studies from 1830-1920, revealing how colonial contexts shaped research, framing foot binding as a prolonged experiment in bone deformation. Analysis of fictional representations, such as Karl Figdor's novel and Joe May's film adaptation, reveals the obscuring of Western desire and a form of second-order exhibitionism.
- What are the key findings of the accompanying publication on the Museum am Rothenbaum's collection of lotus shoes, and what are their implications for museum practices regarding sensitive collections?
- The Museum am Rothenbaum in Hamburg houses a collection of "lotus shoes," artifacts from the Chinese practice of foot binding. A recent publication analyzes Western interpretations of this practice, highlighting the problematic nature of the collection and the need for nuanced contextualization. The book, available open access, uses multiple approaches including analysis of anatomical studies and popular culture depictions.
- What future approaches to museum curation and the handling of culturally sensitive artifacts are suggested by the book's analysis of the lotus shoes collection, and how might these methods improve ethical museum practices?
- The book advocates for a more ethical approach to museum collections by incorporating diverse voices and perspectives. Oral histories are used to trace the changing perception of bound feet from a beauty ideal to a symbol of oppression, highlighting the role of Western influence in the anti-foot-binding movement and its eventual demise with the Cultural Revolution. This approach shifts focus from objectification to subjective accounts, fostering a more nuanced and less appropriative understanding of the practice.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The framing emphasizes the Western gaze and its misinterpretations of footbinding. This is evident in the analysis of anatomical studies and popular culture representations. While highlighting the problematic nature of Western perspectives is crucial, the framing could benefit from a more balanced approach that equally emphasizes the agency and experiences of the Chinese women involved.
Language Bias
The language used is largely neutral and academic. However, terms like "foot mania" could be considered loaded, and terms such as "fetishistic" in the context of Western interpretations might benefit from further qualification to avoid generalization. Suggesting alternative phrasing could improve neutrality.
Bias by Omission
The provided text focuses heavily on the Western reception and interpretation of footbinding in China, potentially omitting perspectives from Chinese women themselves beyond the oral histories mentioned. While the text acknowledges the limitations of Western views, a more in-depth exploration of diverse Chinese perspectives throughout history would enrich the analysis. The impact of footbinding on different social classes within China is also not explicitly addressed.
False Dichotomy
The text doesn't present a false dichotomy in a direct way, but it implicitly sets up a contrast between Western fetishization and the lived experiences of Chinese women. While this contrast is important, it risks simplifying a complex issue with multifaceted perspectives within China.
Gender Bias
The analysis attempts to center the experiences of Chinese women, particularly through the inclusion of oral histories. However, the degree to which these voices are truly centered needs further assessment. The text uses the term "foot mania" which could be viewed as reducing the complex issue of footbinding to a simple obsession.
Sustainable Development Goals
The exhibition and accompanying book challenge the Western fetishization of foot binding, highlighting the agency of women within a repressive system. It uses oral histories to present the perspective of women affected by the practice, showing the shift from the ideal of bound feet to it becoming a mark of shame. The analysis also reveals the role of Western powers in influencing the eventual decline of foot binding.