dw.com
Lukashenko's 2025 Reelection Campaign: Fear-Mongering Amidst Uncertainty
Belarussian President Alexander Lukashenko's reelection campaign for January 26, 2025, is unusually subdued, lacking a clear program and relying on fear-mongering, highlighting the regime's challenges amidst war and sanctions.
- What are the key features of Lukashenko's 2025 reelection campaign, and how do they differ from previous campaigns?
- Belarussian President Lukashenko is running for re-election on January 26, 2025, amid ongoing war and sanctions. His campaign lacks a clear program and relies heavily on fear-mongering, warning of dire consequences if he is not re-elected. Experts note a shift from previous campaigns, focusing on threats rather than promises.
- What are the underlying reasons for the absence of a clear and promising political program in Lukashenko's campaign?
- This election strategy reflects the Belarusian government's current predicament. Facing economic hardship and international isolation, Lukashenko's campaign lacks concrete proposals. Instead, it emphasizes maintaining the status quo and avoids any commitments, essentially admitting an inability to offer a better future for the current generation.
- How might the current political climate and Lukashenko's campaign strategy affect the future political landscape of Belarus, particularly concerning the potential for a transition of power?
- The lack of a clear vision for the future suggests the regime may be preparing for a transition of power. Experts speculate that the current campaign may serve to position a successor, potentially a more palatable figure to international actors, while allowing for a controlled transfer of authority. This is indicated by recent shifts in personnel and governance.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The framing of the article is predominantly negative, focusing on the perceived weaknesses of Lukashenko's campaign and the lack of a clear vision for the future. The use of quotes emphasizing the absence of promises and the bleak outlook contributes to this negative framing. The headline itself sets a critical tone.
Language Bias
The article uses loaded language such as "desperate", "propaganda", "empty chatter", and "bleak outlook". These terms carry negative connotations and contribute to a biased portrayal of Lukashenko's campaign. More neutral terms could be used to present a balanced perspective.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on the opinions of analysts regarding Lukashenko's election campaign and largely omits the perspectives of ordinary Belarusian citizens. This omission limits the understanding of public sentiment and support for Lukashenko.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a somewhat false dichotomy by portraying Lukashenko's campaign as solely focused on fear-mongering ("if not me, then worse") versus a constructive vision. While the lack of a positive program is highlighted, the possibility of nuanced motivations or strategic choices is under explored.
Gender Bias
The article mentions a rise in female "spoilers" in the election, but doesn't analyze this phenomenon in depth regarding its implications for gender representation or possible biases in their roles. More analysis is needed on the potential symbolic meaning and whether this represents actual progress towards gender equality or just a tactic.