dw.com
Lukashenko's Lavish Inauguration in Contrast to 2020 Secrecy
On March 25th, Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko held a lavish inauguration ceremony in Minsk, attended by 1100 guests, broadcast live online, and contrasted sharply with his secretive 2020 inauguration amid international condemnation of the January 2024 election results.
- What were the key differences between Lukashenko's 2020 and 2024 inaugurations, and what message does this contrast convey?
- On March 25th, Belarusian president Alexander Lukashenko held a large-scale inauguration ceremony in Minsk. He took an oath in Belarusian, pledging loyalty to the people and upholding the constitution. This contrasts sharply with his secretive 2020 inauguration.
- How did the Belarusian government respond to the Day of Freedom commemorations by Belarusians abroad, and what are the implications of this response?
- Lukashenko's public inauguration, held on the anniversary of Belarusian Independence Day, is a display of power and legitimacy following controversial elections. The event, attended by 1100 guests, included Belarusian officials and religious leaders, and was broadcast live online. This is in stark contrast to the secretive 2020 inauguration.
- What are the potential long-term domestic and international consequences of Lukashenko's continued rule following the internationally condemned January 2024 elections?
- This highly publicized inauguration serves to consolidate Lukashenko's power and project an image of stability amidst international condemnation of the January 2024 elections. The event's scale underscores the regime's efforts to suppress dissent, particularly considering the concurrent Day of Freedom celebrations by Belarusians abroad who face potential persecution for participating.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The framing is clearly biased towards portraying Lukashenko's actions in a positive light. The use of quotation marks around "inauguration" throughout the article subtly casts doubt on its legitimacy. However, the description of the event's scale and the highlighting of its contrast to the 2020 ceremony aims to create an impression of legitimacy and popular support. The emphasis on the date (coinciding with the Belarusian Independence Day) is also a framing choice aiming to associate Lukashenko with national pride and history.
Language Bias
The use of quotation marks around "inauguration" and "victory" reveals a bias. Describing the election as "so-called elections" reveals bias. More neutral language could be used, such as simply stating the events and allowing readers to draw their own conclusions. The use of words like "massive" and "secret" are loaded terms that add a subjective element to the reporting.
Bias by Omission
The article omits mention of international reactions beyond the PACE statement, neglecting perspectives from other international organizations or countries. It also doesn't include details about the domestic Belarusian opposition's response to the "inauguration.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a false dichotomy by contrasting the "massive" 2024 inauguration with the "secret" 2020 ceremony, implying only two options exist for presidential inaugurations. The reality is far more nuanced, and other types of inaugurations are possible.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article describes the inauguration of Alexander Lukashenko as president of Belarus, an event that lacks legitimacy in the eyes of the international community due to concerns about the fairness and transparency of the preceding election. This undermines democratic processes and institutions, contradicting the principles of peace, justice, and strong institutions promoted by SDG 16.