lexpress.fr
Luxury Sector Slowdown: Growth Slumps to 3.9% in 2024
The luxury goods market experienced a 3.9% growth in 2024, down from double-digit increases in previous years, largely due to slowing growth in China and increased consumer selectivity; however, long-term growth is still projected at 29% between 2024 and 2030.
- How do the varying performances of luxury brands reflect changing consumer preferences and market dynamics, and which segments are most affected?
- The slowdown reveals contrasting performances within the luxury sector. While Hermès thrived (21% growth), Kering struggled (-41%), highlighting increased consumer selectivity and the importance of brand image maintenance. Resilience varied across segments, with jewelry and luxury hotels performing better than wine and champagne.
- What factors caused the significant slowdown in the luxury sector's growth in 2024, and what are the immediate consequences for major European players?
- In 2024, the luxury sector's growth slowed to 3.9% (from a global turnover of €1,630 billion), marking the end of a two-decade boom. This is largely due to slower growth in China (4.9% in 2024 vs 5.2% in 2023), resulting in a 9% drop in the STOXX Europe Luxury 10 index.
- What long-term challenges and opportunities will shape the future of the luxury industry, considering intensifying competition and evolving consumer expectations?
- The future of the luxury sector shows a projected 29% growth between 2024 and 2030, but short-term uncertainty remains due to geopolitical factors and economic instability, including US trade tensions. The increasing competition from Chinese brands, particularly in less exclusive segments, will further differentiate the market leaders.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article frames the slowdown in the luxury sector as a temporary setback, emphasizing the long-term growth potential. While presenting data on the decline, the positive long-term forecast and the highlighting of successful brands like Hermès are strategically placed to convey a sense of optimism and resilience. The headline (if there were one, it's not provided) would likely influence the overall framing. The early introduction of Hermès' success might prime the reader to view the overall situation as less dire.
Language Bias
The language used is generally neutral and factual, relying on data and expert quotes. However, terms like "ultra-exclusive" when describing Hermès and "struggling" when referring to Kering carry subjective connotations. The repeated use of terms like "resilient" for certain segments might subtly influence the reader's perception of their stability. More neutral alternatives like "strong performance" or "maintained market share" could be employed.
Bias by Omission
The analysis focuses primarily on the financial performance of luxury brands and the impact of the slowing Chinese economy. While it mentions geopolitical uncertainties and increased Chinese competition, it lacks depth in exploring these factors. For instance, the specific nature of the US trade tensions and their impact on various luxury segments are not detailed. Similarly, the discussion of Chinese competition is quite general, without specifics on the types of Chinese brands posing a threat or their strategies. The article also omits discussion of other potential factors influencing the luxury market, such as shifts in consumer preferences, sustainability concerns, or the impact of inflation on purchasing power.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a somewhat simplistic dichotomy between luxury brands that are thriving (e.g., Hermès) and those that are struggling (e.g., Kering). While acknowledging performance variations, it doesn't fully explore the nuanced factors contributing to the success or failure of individual brands. The analysis implicitly suggests a binary outcome (success or failure) without acknowledging the possibility of moderate growth or other intermediate performance levels.
Sustainable Development Goals
The slowdown in the luxury sector in 2024, with a mere 3.9% growth compared to double-digit growth in previous years, directly impacts economic growth and employment within the industry. The text highlights job losses or reduced growth opportunities within the sector. The decreased growth also affects related industries and the overall economy.