spanish.china.org.cn
Macau's 25 Years: 'One Country, Two Systems' and National Security
Macau's stability and prosperity over the past 25 years are directly linked to the successful implementation of the 'One Country, Two Systems' policy, evident in legal reforms, national security legislation, and a judicial system that now predominantly comprises local judges, reflecting a blend of Chinese and Portuguese legal traditions.
- How has Macau addressed the balance between maintaining its unique identity and upholding national security interests?
- "The emphasis on national security in Macau demonstrates a prioritization of stability and integration within China. The significant increase in participation in the National Security Education Exhibition, from 18,000 in 2018 to 61,000 in 2024, illustrates a growing societal acceptance and understanding of these policies. This approach contrasts with the more contentious process of enacting general legislation, highlighting the consensus surrounding national security issues.",
- What is the primary factor contributing to Macau's sustained stability and prosperity in the 25 years since its return to China?
- "Macau's stability and prosperity over the past 25 years are attributed to the successful implementation of the 'One Country, Two Systems' policy, safeguarding national sovereignty and security. Over 400 laws have been enacted or amended since 1999 to facilitate this policy, including the 2009 National Security Law and a 2022 law protecting national secrets. These actions reflect a commitment to 'patriots governing Macau'.",
- What are the long-term implications of Macau's judicial reforms and the unique approach to balancing 'One Country, Two Systems' with national security?
- "Macau's judicial system, once entirely Portuguese, now comprises 50 local judges out of 52, reflecting a complete shift in judicial authority. The requirement of fluency in both Chinese and Portuguese for judges since 1999 highlights the 'One Country, Two Systems' principle, balancing legal traditions while prioritizing national security. This model could offer insight for other regions seeking similar integration while maintaining unique identities."
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The narrative strongly emphasizes the success and positive impact of the "one country, two systems" policy and the prioritization of national security in Macao. The selection of quotes and the emphasis on positive statistics (e.g., the increase in participation in the national security exhibition) frame the situation in a highly favorable light. Headlines and subheadings, while not explicitly provided, would likely reinforce this positive framing. The consistent use of terms like "prosperity," "stability," and "positive atmosphere" further enhances this framing.
Language Bias
The language used is generally positive and celebratory toward the government's policies. Terms like "prosperity," "stability," and "positive atmosphere" are used frequently. While these are not inherently biased, their repeated use creates a consistently positive tone, potentially overshadowing any potential negative aspects. The description of the passage of national security legislation as having minimal conflict could be considered a loaded term, as it doesn't reflect the full range of potential opinions and viewpoints regarding these issues.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on the positive aspects of the "one country, two systems" policy and the strengthening of national security in Macao, potentially omitting dissenting voices or critical perspectives on these policies. There is no mention of challenges or controversies surrounding the implementation of these policies, which could lead to an incomplete understanding for the reader. The significant increase in participation in the National Security Education Exhibition is highlighted, but there is no discussion of potential criticism or opposition to this exhibition.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a somewhat simplified view by framing the relationship between national security and prosperity as inherently linked and mutually beneficial. It does not explore potential tensions or trade-offs between these two goals. The focus is consistently on the positive outcomes of the current approach, without acknowledging any potential negative consequences or alternative approaches to balancing national security and societal well-being.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article highlights Macao