kathimerini.gr
Major Museums Face Infrastructure Challenges and Overtourism
Major museums like the British Museum and the Louvre are undergoing costly renovations to address infrastructure problems and the impact of overtourism, a trend amplified by social media's influence on visitor behavior prioritizing quick photos over deeper engagement.
- How does the rise of social media influence visitor behavior and the long-term preservation of museum collections?
- Overtourism, exacerbated by social media's emphasis on quick photos and online sharing, impacts museums. The Louvre, with 8.9 million visitors in 2023, faces damage to its facilities and concerns about temperature fluctuations affecting artwork. The Rijksmuseum in Amsterdam similarly shows visitors prioritizing selfies over in-depth engagement with art.
- What immediate actions are major museums taking to address infrastructure challenges and the impact of overtourism?
- The British Museum and the Louvre, two centuries-old institutions, are undergoing extensive renovations costing over a billion pounds and an unspecified amount, respectively. These renovations address critical infrastructure issues, including crumbling infrastructure and water damage compromising artifacts, as seen in the British Museum's west wing.
- What are the potential long-term consequences of prioritizing social media engagement over deeper appreciation of art and historical artifacts in museums?
- The shift from mindful museum visitors to quick consumers prioritizing social media posts threatens museums' ability to preserve their collections and deliver meaningful experiences. The resulting 'Instagrammable' approach to museums requires adjustments in programming and policy to manage both the crowds and the physical integrity of the artifacts. This trend, amplified post-pandemic, necessitates a re-evaluation of museum purpose and visitor interaction.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article frames the issue primarily through the lens of museums' deterioration and the negative impact of overtourism, neglecting a potential counter-argument: the economic benefits museums derive from tourism. The headline (if there were one) would likely reflect this negative framing. The article's emphasis on damage and the 'bulimic fever' of the public reinforces this negative perspective.
Language Bias
The article uses charged language such as "bulimic fever," "hasty consumer," and "instagramming frenzy" to describe the behavior of visitors. This negatively loaded language influences the reader's perception. More neutral alternatives could include 'increased visitor numbers,' 'rapid visitor engagement,' or 'social media sharing.'
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on the negative impacts of overtourism on museums, but omits discussion of potential solutions or strategies museums are employing to mitigate these issues. While it mentions that museums are adapting programs, it lacks detail on these adaptations. This omission prevents a complete understanding of the situation and the potential for positive change.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a false dichotomy between the 'conscious visitor' and the 'hasty consumer' driven by social media. It suggests these are mutually exclusive categories, ignoring the possibility of visitors engaging with art on multiple levels—both personally and for social media sharing. This oversimplification limits a nuanced understanding of visitor motivations.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article highlights the negative impact of overtourism on museums, including damage to infrastructure and exhibits. The strain on resources and infrastructure due to excessive tourist numbers directly relates to the challenges of sustainable urban development and management of cultural heritage within cities. The need for renovations and adaptations in major museums like the British Museum and the Louvre, due to wear and tear from high visitor numbers, points to the unsustainable nature of current tourism models in these urban contexts. The focus on quick, photo-centric visits instead of deeper engagement with art and history further exemplifies unsustainable tourism practices.