bbc.com
Malaysia to Resume Search for MH370
Malaysia will resume the search for missing Malaysia Airlines Flight MH370, which vanished in 2014 with 239 people aboard, after approving a $70 million deal with Ocean Infinity under a no-find, no-fee arrangement, based on new credible data, to search a 15,000 sq km area in the southern Indian Ocean.
- What is the significance of Malaysia's decision to resume the search for MH370 after previous unsuccessful and costly attempts?
- The Malaysian government has approved a $70 million deal with Ocean Infinity to resume the search for Malaysia Airlines Flight MH370, which disappeared in 2014 with 239 people onboard. The deal is contingent on finding the wreckage; if unsuccessful, Ocean Infinity will not receive payment. This decision follows previous unsuccessful searches, costing $150 million, and comes after new credible data emerged.
- What factors contributed to the Malaysian government's decision to contract Ocean Infinity again, given their previous unsuccessful search?
- This renewed search effort, based on new data and a "no find, no fee" agreement, represents a renewed commitment to resolving a decade-long aviation mystery. The previous searches, though extensive and costly, failed to locate the wreckage, leaving families of victims without closure. The renewed search covers a 15,000 sq km area in the southern Indian Ocean.
- What are the potential implications of both successful and unsuccessful outcomes of this renewed search for aviation safety and the families of victims?
- The success of this search hinges on the credibility of the new data and the capabilities of Ocean Infinity. If successful, it will provide answers to long-standing questions surrounding the disappearance, potentially offering closure to the families involved and advancing aviation safety procedures. Failure could lead to continued uncertainty and speculation.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The framing is largely positive, emphasizing the renewed hope for closure for the families and highlighting the government's commitment to the search. The headline (if there was one) likely emphasized the resumption of the search. The inclusion of emotional quotes from family members further reinforces this positive and sympathetic framing. While not inherently biased, this focus might downplay the significant challenges and potential for further disappointment.
Language Bias
The language used is generally neutral and objective, focusing on factual reporting of events and statements. Words like "haunted," "tragedy," and "hope" are used, but they seem appropriate given the context and emotional nature of the story. There aren't any apparent loaded terms or euphemisms that would skew reader perception.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on the renewed search effort and the emotional impact on families, but it omits details about the various theories surrounding the plane's disappearance beyond mentioning the existence of "conspiracy theories." While acknowledging the 2018 investigation's conclusion that the plane's controls were likely manipulated, it doesn't delve into the specifics of those findings or alternative hypotheses. This omission could limit the reader's understanding of the complexities surrounding the case.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a somewhat simplistic dichotomy between the success or failure of the new search. While acknowledging past failures, it focuses primarily on the hope for a positive outcome this time, potentially overshadowing the significant challenges and uncertainties involved in locating the wreckage in such a vast and deep ocean area.
Sustainable Development Goals
The renewed search for MH370 demonstrates a commitment to providing closure for the families of the victims and addressing a long-standing issue of justice and accountability. The "no find, no fee" agreement suggests a responsible use of public funds and a focus on achieving a tangible result.