dw.com
Mali Curfews Disrupt Businesses and Services
Curfews in Kayes and Segou, Mali, from 9 PM to 6 AM and sunset to sunset respectively, impact small businesses and access to services, causing economic hardship and affecting education, healthcare access, and daily life.
- How do the curfews affect access to essential services like healthcare and education?
- The curfews in Kayes and Segou, Mali, negatively impact small businesses and street vendors, significantly reducing their income and ability to support their families. The reduced hours also affect access to healthcare and student study time.
- What are the immediate economic consequences of the curfews imposed in Kayes and Segou, Mali?
- A curfew is in effect in Kayes, Mali, from 9 PM to 6 AM for 30 days, impacting businesses like welding and fruit/vegetable sales due to reduced operating hours and increased spoilage. In Segou, a curfew since June 4th, similarly affects vendors' income and sales.
- What long-term socio-economic impacts might these curfews have on the affected communities in Mali?
- The long-term effects of these curfews could include increased poverty among vulnerable populations and potential disruptions to education and healthcare services in affected areas. The government should consider economic relief measures to mitigate the negative impacts on citizens.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article frames the curfew primarily through the negative experiences of citizens, giving significant weight to the economic hardships it causes. While the security rationale is mentioned, it is not as prominently featured or extensively explored as the negative economic consequences. The selection and sequencing of quotes emphasize the difficulties faced by ordinary people.
Language Bias
The language used is generally neutral, although terms like "contraignante" (constraining) and "casse-tête" (headache) in relation to the curfew could be considered slightly loaded. These could be replaced with more neutral terms such as "restrictive" and "challenging." The overall tone is empathetic towards the affected citizens.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses on the economic impacts of the curfew on specific individuals and groups, but omits discussion of the security situation that prompted the curfew. While it mentions preventing "braquages" (robberies) and "regroupements suspects" (suspicious gatherings), it lacks detail on the severity or frequency of these incidents, making it difficult to assess the necessity of the curfew. The potential benefits of the curfew are underrepresented compared to the negative economic consequences.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a somewhat simplistic dichotomy between the negative economic impacts of the curfew and its potential positive effects on security. It doesn't fully explore the possibility of alternative solutions that might balance security concerns with the needs of the economy, such as increased police presence or targeted interventions instead of a city-wide curfew.
Gender Bias
The article includes perspectives from both men and women (Ousmane, Kany), but doesn't focus on gender-specific impacts of the curfew. While there's no overt gender bias, a more detailed analysis of whether women or men are disproportionately affected by the curfew's economic consequences would enrich the reporting.
Sustainable Development Goals
The curfew negatively impacts small businesses and street vendors, depriving them of income crucial for their survival and that of their families. This directly contributes to increased poverty and economic hardship among vulnerable populations. Quotes from small business owners highlight reduced sales and spoilage of goods due to shortened working hours.