Manchester Arena Bombing Families Lose MI5 Case

Manchester Arena Bombing Families Lose MI5 Case

dailymail.co.uk

Manchester Arena Bombing Families Lose MI5 Case

Families of the Manchester Arena bombing victims lost their legal case against MI5 due to a procedural issue; the case highlights failures in MI5's handling of intelligence on the bomber.

English
United Kingdom
JusticeHuman Rights ViolationsHuman RightsTerrorismLegal CaseMi5Intelligence FailuresManchester Arena BombingSecurity Services
Mi5Investigatory Powers Tribunal (Ipt)Hudgell SolicitorsSlater & GordonBroudie Jackson Canter
Salman AbediKen MccallumLord Justice SinghMrs Justice FarbeySir John Saunders
Why were the families' legal claims against MI5 dismissed by the tribunal?
MI5 had Salman Abedi on their radar since 2010 but considered him a low priority, despite receiving two crucial pieces of intelligence about him in the months before the attack.
What were the key findings of the official inquiry into the Manchester Arena bombing concerning MI5's actions?
The families of the Manchester Arena bombing victims lost their legal case against MI5 because the tribunal ruled their claims were submitted too late.
What was the response from MI5 and the legal representatives of the victims' families to the tribunal's decision?
The inquiry revealed that MI5 failed to act swiftly on the intelligence, missing a significant opportunity to prevent the attack; the director-general of MI5 has apologized for this failure.

Cognitive Concepts

2/5

Framing Bias

The article frames the story primarily around the failings of MI5 and the suffering of the victims' families, emphasizing the missed opportunities to prevent the attack. This framing could shape the reader's perception to focus on the blame and sorrow and may downplay the broader context of counterterrorism challenges and other factors.

1/5

Language Bias

The language used is largely neutral and factual, reporting on the events and legal proceedings. The use of words like 'horrendous impact' and 'almost unimaginable grief' while aimed at showing empathy, may subtly influence the reader's emotional response towards the victims, but does not make strong value judgements.

3/5

Bias by Omission

The article focuses heavily on the missed opportunities and failures of MI5, while giving less detailed information about the legal arguments made by the families or the response from MI5 beyond the director-general's apology. This omission could lead to an unbalanced portrayal of the situation by downplaying any potential complexities or counter-arguments.

Sustainable Development Goals

Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions Negative
Direct Relevance

The failings of MI5 in preventing the Manchester Arena bombing highlight the importance of strong and accountable institutions for national security and the protection of human life. The missed opportunities to prevent the attack directly relate to the failure of justice and effective security measures.