elpais.com
María San Miguel's "Federico: No Hay Olvido, Ni Sueño: Carne Viva" Premieres in Madrid
María San Miguel's new play, "Federico: No Hay Olvido, Ni Sueño: Carne Viva," exploring the silenced history surrounding Federico García Lorca's assassination, premieres in Madrid on September 7th, fueled by the playwright's personal experience with uncovering family members' remains from Francoist-era mass graves.
- How does San Miguel's personal history influence the play's creation and message?
- San Miguel's family history of victims of Francoist repression, including the exhumation of her great-grandmother's remains at age 17, profoundly shaped her interest in historical memory. This personal experience fuels the play's exploration of the lasting impact of state-sponsored violence and the importance of remembering the disappeared.
- What are the implications of the play's exploration of historical memory in the context of contemporary Spain?
- The play underscores the continued political manipulation and selective silencing surrounding the Francoist era. It critiques the slow pace of justice and the challenges of achieving collective mourning while emphasizing the ongoing impact of unaddressed trauma and the need for a complete reckoning with the past.
- What is the central theme of María San Miguel's play, "Federico: No Hay Olvido, Ni Sueño: Carne Viva," and what is its significance?
- The play centers on the enduring silence surrounding Federico García Lorca's assassination and the broader context of the Francoist regime's violence. It connects Lorca's fate to the 114,000 other forced disappearances, highlighting the unaddressed trauma and the ongoing struggle for historical memory in Spain.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article focuses on Maria San Miguel's play about Federico García Lorca and the broader issue of Spain's historical memory. While the play is the central subject, the interview format allows San Miguel's personal experiences and perspectives to shape the narrative. This framing emphasizes the emotional and personal impact of historical trauma, potentially resonating strongly with audiences but potentially overshadowing other perspectives on Lorca's legacy or the complexities of historical memory in Spain. The headline, if there was one, would likely further influence this framing.
Language Bias
The language used is largely neutral and respectful. However, some terms like "absolute terror" and "genocide" carry strong emotional weight, reflecting San Miguel's perspective. The repeated reference to the 'silencing' around Lorca's death could be interpreted as biased, although it reflects the play's theme. More neutral alternatives could include 'suppression' or 'lack of public discussion'.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on San Miguel's personal experiences and her play. While it touches on the broader political context, it might omit alternative interpretations of Lorca's legacy or differing views on Spain's historical memory. The article doesn't include counter-arguments to San Miguel's strong opinions, resulting in a potentially unbalanced presentation. This omission is understandable due to the interview format, but it is still a relevant point of analysis.
False Dichotomy
The article doesn't present a clear false dichotomy, but it does implicitly frame the discussion around two sides: those who remember and those who forget, or those who uphold historical memory and those who try to erase it. This simplification might overlook the nuances of historical memory, which often involves complex interpretations and conflicting narratives.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article directly addresses the issue of historical justice and reconciliation, crucial aspects of SDG 16 (Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions). It highlights the ongoing struggle for recognition and remembrance of victims of the Franco regime, including the exhumation of bodies and the fight against the erasure of historical atrocities. The play itself serves as a form of remembrance and advocacy for historical truth and justice. The discussion of the Spanish government's insufficient efforts in addressing historical injustices further reinforces this connection.