lemonde.fr
Massive Attack boycotts Spotify and streaming in Israel
British band Massive Attack announced a boycott of Spotify and Israeli streaming services, citing CEO Daniel Ek's investment in military AI and the ongoing conflict in Gaza.
- What is the immediate impact of Massive Attack's boycott?
- Massive Attack's boycott removes their music from Israeli streaming services and Spotify globally, aligning with the 'No Music for Genocide' initiative and impacting their potential revenue. This action also adds pressure to Spotify and highlights ethical concerns over its CEO's military AI investments.
- What are the potential long-term consequences of this cultural boycott movement?
- The sustained success of this boycott could significantly impact Spotify's user base and revenue, prompting a review of its ethical investment policies. It may also inspire further cultural boycotts, raising awareness about geopolitical issues and corporate responsibility within the music industry.
- What are the broader implications of this boycott beyond Massive Attack's actions?
- The boycott reflects a growing movement of artists protesting both the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and the ethical implications of technology investments. It joins other cultural boycotts of Israel and challenges Spotify's business model, potentially inspiring similar actions from other artists.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article presents the actions of Massive Attack as a justified response to the conflict in Gaza and Spotify's CEO investments. The framing emphasizes the band's ethical stance and the 'No Music for Genocide' movement's goals, potentially influencing readers to view the boycott favorably. However, it also presents Spotify's denial of using drones in conflicts outside of Ukraine, offering a counterpoint. The headline focuses on the band's actions, framing the boycott as a significant event.
Language Bias
The article uses strong terms such as "génocide," "nettoyage ethnique," and "apartheid." These terms are loaded and strongly condemn Israel's actions. While accurately reflecting the movement's statement, they lack neutrality. Alternatives could include more neutral descriptions of the events and policies. The phrase "fardeau éthique et moral" (ethical and moral burden) is also emotionally charged, but accurately reflects the band's perspective.
Bias by Omission
The article omits details about the potential consequences of the boycott for Massive Attack's career and financial situation. It also doesn't explore the perspectives of other musicians who may disagree with the boycott or the broader economic implications of such actions on the music industry. Further, it omits details on the exact nature of Helsing's military contracts and the scale of Daniel Ek's investment.
False Dichotomy
The article doesn't present a false dichotomy, as it acknowledges Spotify's denial regarding drone use outside Ukraine, providing some balance. However, the focus remains on the condemnation of Israeli actions and Spotify's CEO's involvement in military technology, potentially overlooking the complexities of the situation and alternative viewpoints.
Sustainable Development Goals
Massive Attack's actions directly relate to SDG 16 (Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions) by promoting a boycott of Israeli streaming services in response to the ongoing conflict and alleged human rights violations. The group's statement highlights concerns about the conflict in Gaza and the broader political repression impacting Palestinian efforts. The boycott is a form of protest against the status quo, advocating for a more just and peaceful resolution to the conflict. The initiative also challenges the role of technology and corporations in perpetuating conflict, aligning with the SDG's call for strong institutions and accountability.