Meningoencephalitis in Great White Sharks Baffles Scientists

Meningoencephalitis in Great White Sharks Baffles Scientists

dailymail.co.uk

Meningoencephalitis in Great White Sharks Baffles Scientists

Multiple dead great white sharks with enlarged brains have washed ashore on North American beaches since July 2022, baffling scientists who are investigating a potential new infectious disease affecting their brain tissue, while other scientists speculate it could be linked to population increase and climate change.

English
United Kingdom
HealthScienceUsaCanadaGreat White SharksMeningoencephalitisMarine Wildlife HealthBrain Inflammation
Canadian Wildlife Health Cooperative (Cwhc)Marine Animal Response Society
Megan JonesTonya Wimmer
How might climate change, prey abundance, and population dynamics of great white sharks contribute to the observed increase in deaths?
The rising number of great white shark deaths with brain inflammation could be linked to a new infectious disease or other unknown factors. While some scientists speculate that this could be a natural consequence of population growth and environmental changes such as warmer waters, the consistent nature of the brain inflammation in multiple sharks suggests a potentially more concerning underlying issue. Further research is urgently needed.
What is causing the unprecedented number of great white shark deaths with brain inflammation along the coasts of North America, and what are the immediate consequences?
In 2023, an unusual number of dead great white sharks with enlarged brains washed up on North American beaches. This phenomenon, first noted in Canada in August 2023, has since been observed in the United States, with the first case reported in July 2022. The sharks exhibited meningoencephalitis, a brain inflammation, which is baffling scientists due to the sharks' typically strong immune systems.
What are the long-term implications of this phenomenon for the conservation of great white sharks and the broader marine ecosystem, and what research is needed to address the unknowns?
The lack of understanding regarding great white shark health and the underfunding of research hinder efforts to determine the cause of these unusual deaths. This, coupled with potential biases against the species, could delay the implementation of effective conservation strategies. The future of the great white shark population hinges on gaining a better understanding of this concerning trend.

Cognitive Concepts

2/5

Framing Bias

The article's framing emphasizes the mystery and alarm surrounding the brain inflammation in great white sharks, creating a sense of urgency and highlighting the unknown nature of the situation. The headline itself likely contributes to this framing. While this approach may be effective in capturing the reader's attention, it potentially overshadows other important aspects, such as the overall threats to the species and the need for comprehensive conservation efforts. The article also prioritizes the scientists' concerns and uncertainty, which further reinforces the narrative of a significant threat.

2/5

Language Bias

While the article generally maintains a neutral tone, certain word choices could be considered slightly loaded. For example, describing the situation as a "marine mystery" and using phrases like "baffled scientists" and "alarming phenomenon" adds to the dramatic effect. These terms heighten the sense of urgency and unknown threat, potentially influencing the reader's perception. More neutral alternatives could be: 'Scientists are investigating a recent increase in the number of dead great white sharks,' 'Researchers are studying the unusual finding of brain inflammation in several great white sharks,' and 'Unusual cases of brain inflammation in great white sharks have prompted scientists to investigate potential causes'.

3/5

Bias by Omission

The article focuses heavily on the mysterious brain inflammation in great white sharks but omits discussion of other potential mortality factors for sharks besides this specific disease. While it mentions commercial fishing as a threat, it doesn't delve into the specifics of its impact or provide data on shark deaths due to other causes (e.g., bycatch, entanglement in fishing gear). The limited exploration of these additional factors creates a potentially skewed understanding of the overall threat level facing great white sharks. Additionally, the article does not consider the possibility of naturally occurring variations in brain inflammation rates, or a surge that is not indicative of a larger trend or new disease.

3/5

False Dichotomy

The article presents a false dichotomy by implying that the increased number of dead sharks is either due to a new infectious disease or a natural consequence of population increase. It oversimplifies the complex factors influencing shark mortality, neglecting to consider the interplay of various environmental, biological, and anthropogenic influences. The framing suggests these are the only two possibilities when in reality, multiple factors could be contributing to the observed increase in deaths.

Sustainable Development Goals

Life Below Water Negative
Direct Relevance

The article highlights a concerning die-off of great white sharks due to an unknown brain inflammation. This directly impacts the health of marine ecosystems and the conservation status of this vulnerable species. The lack of understanding regarding the cause further exacerbates the threat.