kathimerini.gr
Meritocracy, Failure, and Trump's Election
This article examines the cultural attitudes towards success and failure in Greece and America, and uses Donald Trump's election as a case study to analyze the implications of meritocratic systems and the appeal of populism.
Greek
Greece
Us PoliticsElectionPopulismInequalitySocial CommentaryMeritocracy
None
Donald TrumpMichael Sandel
- What is the concluding point of the article?
- The article concludes by stating that Trump's election represents a rejection of the established order. The true implications of this rejection remain to be seen.
- What critique does the author make of the American meritocracy system?
- The author critiques the American meritocracy system, arguing that it masks underlying inequalities and disproportionately benefits those from privileged backgrounds. This system labels those who fail as 'losers', ignoring systemic barriers.
- What paradox is highlighted in relation to Trump's appeal to his voters?
- A paradox is presented: despite being a product of the elite, Trump was able to appeal to those who felt excluded from the meritocratic system. He presented himself as an outsider targeted by the establishment, creating a sense of shared grievance.
- How does the author interpret Trump's electoral success in the context of the article's themes?
- The article suggests that Trump's electoral success can be seen as a revolt of the marginalized, who felt ignored and disrespected by the elite. His campaign strategy of self-victimization resonated with those who identified with his experience of being excluded.
- How does the article compare the cultural attitudes towards success and failure in Greece and America?
- The article contrasts the cultural attitudes towards success and failure in Greece and America. In Greece, failure is often attributed to external factors, while in America, personal responsibility is emphasized.