Mexico: Highest Pegasus Spyware Victim Count in 2019

Mexico: Highest Pegasus Spyware Victim Count in 2019

elpais.com

Mexico: Highest Pegasus Spyware Victim Count in 2019

In 2019, Mexico experienced the highest number of Pegasus spyware attacks globally, with 456 victims between April 29 and May 10, representing 37% of the total 1,233 cases documented in a WhatsApp lawsuit against the spyware's manufacturer, NSO Group. The attacks targeted diverse individuals including human rights defenders and journalists, raising concerns about government surveillance and accountability.

Spanish
Spain
PoliticsHuman Rights ViolationsHuman RightsMexicoWhatsappGovernment SurveillanceNso GroupPegasus Spyware
Nso GroupWhatsappFacebookRed En Defensa De Los Derechos Digitales (R3D)Amnistía InternacionalArtículo 19Centro De Derechos Humanos Miguel Agustín ProCentro Nacional De Inteligencia (Mexico)Centro Militar De Inteligencia (Mexico)Secretaría De La Defensa (SedenaMexico)Procuraduría General De La República (PgrMexico)Cisen (Mexico)
Andrés Manuel López ObradorEnrique Peña NietoFelipe CalderónPedro SánchezCarmen Aristegui
What was the scale of Pegasus spyware attacks in Mexico in 2019, and what are the immediate implications for the country?
Between April 29 and May 10, 2019, 456 Mexican individuals were victims of Pegasus spyware attacks via WhatsApp, representing 37% of the 1,233 globally affected. This was the highest number of victims in any country during that period, according to court documents filed in a WhatsApp lawsuit against NSO Group, the Israeli company that manufactures Pegasus.
How has the use of Pegasus spyware in Mexico evolved across different administrations, and what are the underlying causes for its persistent use?
The use of Pegasus spyware in Mexico dates back to 2011, with documented use by the Mexican government continuing under various administrations despite criticisms. The scale of the 2019 attacks, as revealed in the WhatsApp lawsuit, highlights the government's extensive use of this technology for surveillance, contradicting claims that it was only used for investigating organized crime.
What are the long-term implications of state-sponsored surveillance using Pegasus spyware in Mexico, and what measures are needed to address the associated human rights concerns?
The ongoing secrecy surrounding government contracts for Pegasus spyware in Mexico, along with the lack of transparency and accountability regarding its use, raises serious concerns about human rights violations and potential future abuses. The revelation of attacks targeting human rights defenders and journalists underscores the need for greater oversight and independent investigation of state-sponsored surveillance practices.

Cognitive Concepts

2/5

Framing Bias

The article frames the story primarily around the scale of Pegasus usage in Mexico, highlighting Mexico as the country with the most victims. While this is factually accurate based on the provided data, the emphasis on this specific statistic might overshadow the broader context of governmental surveillance and human rights concerns. The headline (if one existed) likely would reinforce this framing. The opening paragraph immediately focuses on Mexico's high number of victims, setting the tone for the rest of the article.

1/5

Language Bias

The article uses relatively neutral language in most instances. However, descriptions such as calling Pegasus a "malware" or "spyware" carry inherent negative connotations. While accurate descriptors, using terms such as "surveillance software" or "monitoring technology" could offer more neutral alternatives, particularly when discussing the government's stated purpose for using the software. The use of the word "intervened" could also be considered slightly loaded, and might be replaced with something like "monitored" or "targeted.

3/5

Bias by Omission

The article focuses heavily on the use of Pegasus in Mexico, but omits discussion of the broader global implications and the number of countries affected beyond Mexico. While it mentions use in other countries like UAE and Spain, it lacks comparative analysis of the scale and impact of Pegasus usage in those contexts. The article also omits details on the specific legal ramifications of the WhatsApp lawsuit against NSO Group, beyond stating it exists and that NSO confirmed Mexico's usage. This omission prevents a complete understanding of the legal consequences faced by NSO Group and the Mexican government.

3/5

False Dichotomy

The article presents a false dichotomy by implying that the use of Pegasus is either for legitimate "intelligence gathering" or outright "espionage." The reality is likely more nuanced, with potential for misuse even in ostensibly legitimate intelligence operations. The narrative simplifies the complex ethical and legal questions surrounding surveillance technologies.

Sustainable Development Goals

Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions Negative
Direct Relevance

The widespread use of Pegasus spyware by Mexican governments to spy on journalists, human rights activists, and political opponents undermines the rule of law, due process, and fundamental human rights. This is a direct violation of SDG 16, which promotes peaceful and inclusive societies for sustainable development, access to justice for all, and building effective, accountable, and inclusive institutions at all levels.