repubblica.it
Milan Project Aims to Standardize SME Sustainability Measurement
A Milan-based project, funded by the PNRR and involving 24 partners, aims to measure the sustainability performance of 2087 SMEs, with only 108 currently voluntarily reporting; the initiative seeks to create standardized benchmarks and accessible tools to encourage broader adoption of sustainable practices.
- How does the project aim to address the lack of standardized sustainability benchmarks for SMEs?
- The project, led by Bocconi University and funded by the Italian National Recovery and Resilience Plan (PNRR), involves 24 public and private entities. It seeks to create a system for measuring sustainability contributions across various dimensions (carbon footprint, energy consumption, etc.) and their overall societal impact, using accounting principles.
- What are the potential long-term societal and economic impacts of widespread adoption of the project's sustainability measurement tools?
- The project's long-term goal is to transform businesses into productive entities contributing to a better future. By establishing comparable benchmarks for sustainability and providing accessible measurement tools, particularly for SMEs, the project addresses the current lack of standardized sustainability metrics and aims to drive broader adoption of sustainable practices.
- What is the main challenge addressed by the Sustainability and Impact-weighted accounting measurement project in the Milan metropolitan area?
- A new initiative, the Sustainability and Impact-weighted accounting measurement project, aims to measure the sustainability performance of businesses in the Milan metropolitan area. Only about 5% of 2087 surveyed small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) voluntarily report sustainability data, highlighting a significant gap.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article is framed positively towards the SrbLab project and its aim to promote sustainability measurement among SMEs. The emphasis is on the benefits and transformative potential of sustainability, while potential challenges or obstacles are downplayed. The use of quotes from the project lead reinforces this positive framing.
Language Bias
The language used is generally neutral, employing terms like "transformative," "efficiency," and "innovation." However, phrases such as "circolo virtuoso" (virtuous circle) and descriptions of sustainability as a "forza trasformativa" (transformative force) carry somewhat positive connotations. While not overtly biased, these choices subtly promote a positive perception of sustainability.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on the Italian context and the project's efforts within Milan's metropolitan area. While it mentions global issues like wealth inequality (citing the Oxfam report), it doesn't deeply explore the international implications of sustainability measurement or the varied approaches used globally. This omission might limit the reader's understanding of the broader context and the project's potential impact beyond Italy.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a somewhat simplified view of the relationship between profitability and sustainability, suggesting that embracing sustainability leads to increased efficiency and lower risk. While this is often true, the article doesn't fully acknowledge potential short-term costs or conflicts that businesses might face in transitioning to more sustainable practices.
Sustainable Development Goals
The project aims to measure and improve the sustainability of businesses, contributing to fairer wealth distribution and addressing inequality. The initiative highlights the link between business practices and global inequality, advocating for a more equitable distribution of value generated by companies. Improved sustainability practices can lead to better working conditions and fairer compensation, thus reducing inequality.