dw.com
Milanović Projected to Win Croatian Presidential Election Amidst Pro-Russian Interference Allegations
Croatia's presidential election second round polls predict Zoran Milanović's victory (62.5%-67.4% support) over Dragan Primorac (27.8%-26.8%), amid a controversy over a report alleging pro-Russian bot network interference, which has faced criticism for its methodology and lack of transparency.
- What are the projected outcomes of the Croatian presidential election's second round, and what are the immediate implications of these predictions?
- According to recent polls by Promocija Plus (RTL) and IPSOS (Nova TV), Zoran Milanović is projected to win the Croatian presidential election's second round with 62.5% and 67.4% support respectively. His opponent, Dragan Primorac, received 27.8% and 26.8% support in these polls.
- What is the significance of the CIR report on alleged pro-Russian interference, and how credible are its findings given the criticisms raised by Croatian sources?
- The election campaign was marked by a report from the Center for Information Resilience (CIR) alleging significant influence from pro-Russian bot networks, particularly those with Serbian elements, promoting Milanović while attacking Primorac and spreading anti-EU/NATO messages. However, the report's credibility has been questioned by Croatian media, IT experts, and NGO GONG due to inconsistencies and lack of transparency.
- What are the potential long-term effects of the observed online manipulation tactics and campaign spending on Croatian politics, including the upcoming local elections?
- The conflicting information surrounding online manipulation and the differing poll results highlight the complexities of modern elections. The substantial spending disparity between the campaigns (Primorac spent €854,000, Milanović €215,000) raises questions about the influence of money in politics and the potential impact on future local elections.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
While the article presents poll results favoring Milanović, it also includes details about criticisms of those polls and the CIR report. The headline could be framed to be more neutral, focusing on the closeness of the race rather than a predicted outcome.
Language Bias
The article generally maintains a neutral tone, presenting both sides of the arguments and acknowledging conflicting claims. However, phrases like "proruski utjecaj" (pro-Russian influence) and "niski udarci" (low blows) could be considered somewhat loaded. More neutral alternatives might include "alleged Russian influence" and "negative campaigning".
Bias by Omission
The article mentions a report by the Center for Information Resilience (CIR) alleging pro-Russian bot activity favoring Milanović and attacks against Primorac. However, it also acknowledges criticism of the CIR report's methodology and mentions that TikTok removed 7,000 bots from Primorac's profile, a fact seemingly omitted from the CIR report. The article also notes that a Jutarnji list poll showing initial support for Milanović experienced a sudden shift towards Primorac, raising questions of potential manipulation, but doesn't offer definitive conclusions. The omission of potential counter-narratives or deeper investigation into these conflicting claims could limit the reader's ability to form a complete picture.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a somewhat simplistic eitheor framing of the election as influenced by pro-Russian interference versus organic support. The nuances of online manipulation and the possibility of multiple actors influencing the election are not fully explored.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article highlights concerns about foreign interference in the Croatian presidential election, specifically mentioning the influence of pro-Russian and pro-Serbian bot networks attempting to manipulate public opinion. This interference undermines democratic processes and the integrity of elections, directly impacting the goal of strong and accountable institutions.