taz.de
Mishima's Resurgence: Right-Wing Extremists Embrace Japanese Author
Yukio Mishima, a Japanese author who died by ritual suicide in 1970, is experiencing a resurgence in popularity among European right-wing extremists due to his nationalist views and exploration of themes of violence, death, and masculinity in his novels and essays, such as "The Sailor Who Fell From Grace With the Sea" and "In Defense of a Culture.
- How do Mishima's nationalist views and critiques of Western influence contribute to his appeal among right-wing groups?
- Mishima's works delve into the male psyche, exploring the interplay between aesthetics and fascination with evil, often culminating in a strong death wish. This fascination, coupled with his nationalist views and critique of Japan's post-WWII trajectory, has led to his adoption by right-wing groups. His essay "In Defense of a Culture" further exemplifies his staunch nationalism and criticism of Western influence on Japanese culture.
- What is the significance of Yukio Mishima's rising popularity among European right-wing extremists, and what are the immediate implications?
- Yukio Mishima, a Japanese author who died by ritual suicide in 1970, is experiencing a resurgence in popularity among European right-wing extremists. His novels, such as "The Sailor Who Fell From Grace With the Sea," explore themes of violence, masculinity, and death, resonating with certain extremist groups. This renewed interest highlights the complex relationship between literature and political ideology.
- What are the long-term implications of the appropriation of Mishima's work by extremist groups, and how should this complex legacy be critically addressed?
- The appropriation of Mishima by the far-right presents a challenge to separating the author from his work. While his novels explore complex themes, their use by extremist groups for propaganda purposes raises concerns. The future may see continued efforts to utilize his image and writings in right-wing discourse, demanding critical engagement with the complexities of his legacy.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The framing emphasizes Mishima's connection to right-wing extremism, potentially leading readers to primarily associate him with such ideologies. The headline, while neutral, and the repeated focus on right-wing adoption of Mishima's image and ideas shape the narrative.
Language Bias
The article uses loaded language such as "crude," "pathos-laden," and "campy" when describing Mishima's work and appearance. These terms carry subjective judgments that may influence reader perception. More neutral language could be used.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on Mishima's life and right-wing appropriation of his work, but omits discussion of critical responses to his novels and essays from non-right-wing perspectives. This omission limits a complete understanding of Mishima's impact and legacy.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a false dichotomy by implying that the only interpretations of Mishima's work are either right-wing appropriation or a complete dismissal. It neglects the possibility of nuanced interpretations that acknowledge both the problematic aspects and literary merit of his writings.
Gender Bias
While the article discusses Mishima's homosexuality, it does so within the context of right-wing appropriation and his unconventional masculinity. There's no broader discussion of gender roles or representation in his works or the potential impact on his readers.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article highlights the resurgence of Mishima's works among right-wing extremists, indicating a potential negative impact on efforts to reduce inequality. The appropriation of Mishima's ideas by such groups could normalize and even promote discriminatory ideologies that exacerbate societal inequalities.