sueddeutsche.de
Mismatched Tires: Safety Risks and ACE Recommendations
The ACE advises against mismatched tires due to negative effects on handling and electronic systems; recommends replacing tires in pairs of the same model and manufacturer; suggests regular tire rotation even for all-season tires and professional inspection for tires over six years old.
- What long-term strategies, beyond legal minimums, can drivers implement to maximize tire lifespan and safety, considering both wear and age?
- Tires older than six years require expert assessment even if tread depth is sufficient, as micro-cracking may compromise safety. Regular tire rotation, even with all-season tires, promotes even wear, especially beneficial for front-wheel-drive vehicles. This also helps early detection of suspension or alignment problems, extending tire lifespan.
- What are the immediate safety implications of using mismatched tires, and what specific recommendations does the ACE offer to mitigate risks?
- The ACE recommends replacing damaged or worn tires in pairs on the same axle, ideally with identical models from the same manufacturer. Mixing tires, while legally permissible, negatively impacts handling, increasing braking distances and reducing stability. Different tread depths especially affect aquaplaning resistance.
- How do different tire models or tread depths affect the performance of electronic driver assistance systems, and what are the potential consequences?
- Mismatched tires, even with similar tread depth but varying models, can confuse electronic stability systems (ESP) leading to erratic interventions and potentially inaccurate tire pressure monitoring system readings. This is because differences in grip and wheel speed can be misinterpreted. The impact is particularly significant regarding aquaplaning.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The article frames mixed tire use as inherently risky, using strong language like "vehemently advises against." The headline and introduction emphasize the potential dangers, shaping the reader's perception toward prioritizing tire uniformity.
Language Bias
The article uses strong and potentially loaded language, such as "vehemently", which could exaggerate the risks of mixed tires. Phrases like 'problematic' and 'drohen' (threaten) amplify negative consequences. More neutral alternatives could include "strongly discourages", "may cause", and "could lead to.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on the ACE's recommendations and doesn't present contrasting viewpoints from other automotive experts or organizations. While acknowledging legal permissibility of mixed tires, it omits discussion of situations where mixed tires might be acceptable (e.g., temporary fixes for short distances).
False Dichotomy
The article presents a false dichotomy by strongly advising against mixed tires without acknowledging the potential for some drivers to safely use them under specific circumstances or limited situations. The article does not explore nuances or contextual factors.
Sustainable Development Goals
The article promotes responsible consumption and production by advising on proper tire maintenance, replacement, and usage. This reduces waste by extending tire lifespan and preventing premature replacement due to improper usage or mixing of tires. The recommendation to replace tires in pairs and avoid mismatched tires contributes to resource efficiency and reduced environmental impact from tire production and disposal.