nos.nl
Miss Nederland Pageant Ends After 35 Years
The Miss Nederland pageant is ending after 35 years due to consistent criticism and the belief that it's outdated; a new online platform, "Niet meer van deze tijd," will focus on empowering young women.
- What prompted the end of the Miss Nederland pageant after 35 years, and what are the immediate consequences?
- After 35 years, the Miss Nederland pageant is ending due to increasing criticism and the organizer's belief that it's outdated. The final winner, Amber Rustenberg, supports the change, highlighting the limited reach of crowning only one woman annually. A new online platform, "Niet meer van deze tijd," will focus on empowering young women.
- How did criticisms surrounding past winners, particularly Rikkie Kollé, influence the decision to replace the pageant with an online platform?
- The decision follows controversies surrounding the 2023 winner, Rikkie Kollé, who faced hate and death threats as a trans woman. This, along with consistent criticism targeting winners based on appearance or perceived identity, fueled the decision to discontinue the pageant. The new platform aims to overcome these issues by fostering inclusivity and broader engagement.
- What are the potential long-term impacts of transitioning from a beauty pageant to an online platform focused on empowering young women, and what challenges might this new platform face?
- The shift from a beauty pageant to an online platform signals a move towards a more inclusive and empowering model for young women. This transition reflects evolving societal views on beauty standards and gender representation, suggesting a broader trend of challenging traditional pageants. The platform's focus on diversity, mental health, and self-expression positions it to positively impact a wider audience.
Cognitive Concepts
Framing Bias
The narrative emphasizes the negative aspects of the Miss Nederland pageant, highlighting the controversies and criticisms surrounding it. The headline itself focuses on the end of the pageant and the owner's statement that it is 'not of this time,' immediately setting a negative tone. The article prioritizes the negative experiences of winners, particularly Rikkie Kollé, and Amber Rustenberg's account of criticism. This framing might lead readers to conclude that the pageant was primarily a source of negativity rather than acknowledging any positive aspects.
Language Bias
The article uses language that leans towards a negative portrayal of the pageant. Phrases like "niet meer van deze tijd" (not of this time), "veel kritiek" (much criticism), "negatieve energie" (negative energy), and "ophef" (commotion) are used repeatedly. While these are accurate descriptions of events, their frequency contributes to a negative tone. More neutral terms could be used to provide a more balanced perspective. For example, instead of "veel kritiek", "significant feedback" could be used.
Bias by Omission
The article focuses heavily on the criticisms and controversies surrounding the Miss Nederland pageant, particularly the 2023 winner, Rikkie Kollé. While mentioning the pageant's history and its stated goal of promoting social engagement, it omits details about the positive impacts or contributions the pageant might have had over its 35 years. The lack of positive counterpoints to the criticisms could lead to a biased understanding of the pageant's overall legacy. Additionally, it does not explore other criticisms of beauty pageants in general, nor does it delve into the economic impact of the pageant's discontinuation. This is likely due to space constraints but contributes to a potentially incomplete picture.
False Dichotomy
The article presents a false dichotomy by framing the choice as between the Miss Nederland pageant and the new online platform. It implies that the pageant is inherently flawed and the new platform is its superior replacement. It ignores the possibility that both could co-exist or that alternative solutions could have been explored. This framing simplifies a complex issue and may lead readers to accept the new platform uncritically.
Gender Bias
While the article discusses the experiences of both male and female participants, the focus is primarily on the experiences of women. The negative experiences of the winners, who are all women, are given significant attention. The article could benefit from exploring the impact of the pageant on men involved and broadening the gender-related discussion to include issues such as gender norms perpetuated by the pageant, rather than solely focusing on the negative experiences of female participants.
Sustainable Development Goals
The discontinuation of the Miss Nederland pageant and its replacement with an online platform focused on empowering young women addresses issues of gender equality and harmful stereotypes perpetuated by beauty pageants. The new platform will focus on self-expression, diversity, and mental and physical health, promoting a more inclusive and holistic view of womanhood.